Anatomy of a Penetration Test
visuallyexplainedpentest.barricade.io
visuallyexplainedpentest.barricade.io
And then in the previous paragraph "someone has been running Cross Site Scripting attacks..."
Either XSS is such common knowledge that everyone knows what it means, or else...
Security is hard. SIEMs, behavioural IDSs, packet analysers etc, have all been done before - and you need someone full time to babysit the rules and all the false positives that they throw up for any moderately complex network with new apps/devices/use cases being added all the time.
There is a lot of detail on the architecture of Barricade, but nothing on how it differs from existing SIEMS, incident response, managing rulesets, tuning false positives, etc.
I suggest you put up more detailed information besides "machine learning" to show concretely how your tech is better than the stuff that has come before.
I work for a web hoster. My job is spread equally across Linux and Windows as both a sysadmin and developer so I have no axe to grind either way, each has features and capabilities I love, each has its own annoyances that make my roll my eyes.
Now, if there's anything that's going to put me off a company and its services then it's language and claims such as:
> "Windows is not as secure"
> "Windows is often regarded as a scrip kiddie OS"
If you want to be taken seriously by pro's that's the sort of thing I wouldn't be sticking on my web pages. It's tiresome tedious stuff.
PS: It's just an advertisement.
"While you may be able to avoid & slip under the radar of a local Intrusion Detection System, it is unlikely you'll be able to avoid being caught by a cloud hosted IDS like Barricade."
Ugh.