I was positively aware that they weren't doing it and noticed about an hour ago that they started doing it. If I noticed this change I'm sure that many other people noticed and many more are being subconsciously annoyed.
Thin ice Reddit, thin ice.
I was positively aware that they weren't doing it and noticed about an hour ago that they started doing it. If I noticed this change I'm sure that many other people noticed and many more are being subconsciously annoyed.
Thin ice Reddit, thin ice.
Even more annoying when the destination url is a PDF which you now can't copy the link to but only download.
I've been thinking it might be interesting to allow for easy hosting of Google proxies, like a one-click install on digitalocean that could be shared among a group of friends (~100 users at most).
> even though Chrome supports the <a> ping attribute that obviates the need for it (and which was presumably added to Chrome exactly for Google Search's own use-case)?
And that's one reason why I don't use Chrome.
There is so much wrong with a company adding features to their browser in order to facilitate special cases for their own website.
Isn't <a> ping good for the end user? Unless you disagree with any ability to track outbound clicks - in which case we can politely agree to disagree.
I don't see this as a special case at all - a substantial proportion of link shortener usage, for example, is not for link shortening, but because most of them offer analytics.
Which means you end up having to open the URL first yourself just to copy and share it. And that doesn't even always work, since URLs triggering downloads don't update the URL in the address field (at least in Firefox).
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&c...
I'm sharing it with you. Is this unusable? Did you not get to the news article I was sharing with you by clicking on the link? So what's your point?
Same reason that URL shorteners are bad UX. Source (creator of Delicious): http://joshua.schachter.org/2009/04/on-url-shorteners
The redirect links are fairly easy to trim. The real URL is at the end. So in the worst case, just snip it out.
I'm sure there are browser extensions that will do it for you.
The real URL is at the end. So in the worst case,
just snip it out.
I hope you remember all your character URL-encodings so you can snip out http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.54.3597%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf right.No you don't. They start out clean, but when you click or right click on the link, it changes.
But I just checked again, and you're partially correct. Some but not all links are replaced with the redirect on click or right click. If you browse with JavaScript disabled, some links are prepopulated as redirects, and others are not.
Google is a moving target.
https://ddg.gg (short URL)
[0] the search engine that doesn't track you
edit: i can't find a way to disable this behaviour in the settings either.
edit 2 : Strange. It doesn't seem to be doing it now. I could sworn i have seen it use redirect links on multiple occassions.
"You can circumvent that by right clicking and holding elsewhere then moving the mouse to the link, releasing and then copying."
User: gasdoves
Although at their scale, I think things are very very different.