Mozilla Context Graph: It’s time to bring context back to the web
medium.com
medium.com
In my experience, this is an ambitious goal. As humans, we don't like change and, as a whole, won't do it without strong reason. Opening your browser means going to the bigger sites (e.g., Facebook) because they're convenient. The convenience isn't due to only thinking Facebook when thinking of social media, it's about what features Facebook offers me as its user.
If, on the other hand, the goal is more for the audience than the small websites, and it's to expose the average viewer to more variety, why not partner with Stumbleupon, Reddit, or one of many other community link-aggregation platforms?
What's Mozilla's goal here? Making a play for ads? The appearance of feature parity with whatever Google (and now Microsoft) puts out?
I think the distributed, federated approach such as Friendica (et al.) will be more likely to succeed than this, in large part due to data ownership concerns.
That said, variety in this space is always welcome. We, as the users, can only benefit from it.
It sounds like if you opt in to this venture, it will use your browsing habits to mine those relationships; I wonder if it will ingest Facebook's "OpenGraph" tags [2].
[1] https://developers.facebook.com/docs/sharing/opengraph/using...
[2] http://ogp.me/
And what about spam?
You should ask people involved in the #contextgraph channel on irc.mozilla.org (https://client02.chat.mibbit.com/?server=irc.mozilla.org%3A%...)
The two most concrete things right now related to Context Graph are probably Activity Stream and the Fathom project. Fathom is an experimental framework to extract meaning from web pages ad can be used for a wide range of applications.
Production builds of Activity Stream can installed via TestPilot.
https://github.com/mozilla/activity-stream https://github.com/mozilla/fathom https://testpilot.firefox.com