Maybe author did not want to deal with Lenovo.
> Lenovo did not develop the vulnerable SMM code and is still in the process of determining the identity of the original author, it does not know its originally intended purpose.
> Lenovo did not develop the vulnerable SMM code and is still in the process of determining the identity of the original author, it does not know its originally intended purpose.
> I agreed to do that, but they haven't accepted my terms and conditions (just for case -- I haven't asked them about money)
Although based on the author's original blog post and title for the GitHub repo, it seems that he originally thought it was Lenovo specific...