Steam warns users against gambling site after YouTube stars discovered as owners

Hopefully someone else can jump in with more specific rules, but I would imagine that if you're pretending to be a neutral third party mentioning a service when you actually own it, the FCC might have a problem with that.

edit: I see this is already mentioned in the thread. Oh well :-)

While I definitely agree that valve is in some way culpable, I do feel that even without the systems they've put in place, you would see this sort of abuse. Look at Diablo 2 and early WoW. It's pretty obvious that many of the gray markets in today's online games were created in direct response to the black/gray markets that sprung up around those games. When these markets emerged, game developers basically had the option to either try and shut these systems down (not an easy task, perhaps impossible) or to reinforce and rebuild them. Clearly, most companies chose the latter. Valve even went as far as hiring the economist Yanis Varoufakis (who went on to become finance minister of Greece for a hot second) to help them manage their online markets. They clearly saw a lot of money being made and said to themselves, "why shouldn't I get a piece of the action?" I can't say I blame them, game devs should be compensated and compensated well. That being said, csgo is not a free to play game.

As a csgo player, I find the whole skin system incredibly frustrating. Not only does it add no real value to the game in terms of gameplay, it also encourages a lot of bad behavior, such as hacking, scamming, spamming, etc. It also seems pretty clear that the decisions valve makes directly influence how easy/profitable it is to engage in these behaviors. While I don't think they are solely culpable for bad behavior on their platform, I do feel that they could do more to discourage it, even if it isn't in their financial interest.