Disclaimer: Indian, IT consultant.
Disclaimer: Indian, IT consultant.
I can say that I know others who have been through similar experiences.
I've been living in India for nearly a decade now. Casteism and religion-ism are very non-obvious to those unaffected (or positivrly affected) by it, but spend enough time outside your bubble and you start realizing that it exists often in an undercurrent and start recognizing situations like the one he talks of for what they really are. I've seen far more overt versions of his anecdote play out; I have no trouble believing him there.
Moreover to state that the immigration officer inferred him speaking English as a sign of class is in itself racist; English is one of the official languages of the country, plenty of Indians speak very fluent English.
Never seen anything like that in India which moderates societal differences to a very high degree.
Given recent history of blasts in India from uninvited visitors, why should Indians not want their consulate services to inquire about people's backgrounds and intentions ?
Most likely it was just from his British passport.
It is possible that the reasons are not what the author thought they were. But it is pretty likely that they were, and I'm suggesting we give the author the benefit of the doubt in that he had valid reasons and prior similar experiences to feel that way.
It is very easy to discount an experience when your bubble makes you think it is impossible. For many years I didn't think casteism was a thing anymore in cities, since I never saw it happening. Over time I realized that it is still very much there, just that those not negatively affected by it tend to not notice it.
And from my position, Muslims in India have it pretty fucking good. In what world can people like this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asaduddin_Owaisi
get away with being spewing divisive bullshit, and then call for action against Muslim discrimination and for reservations for Muslims? Muslims have their own penal code! Up until the BJP rule, legislation was in favour of Muslims, at the expense of togetherness of society.
In India Muslims have a pretty powerful political position given the fact that they are a minority. I somehow am disinclined to believe that the author suffered any actual discrimination given the political clime in India.
No.
All Indians follow the same Criminal, Contract, Labor, Company, Tort, Property and Tax laws.
The only exception is Personal law (marriage, inheritance, adoption etc) where for historical reasons there were separate laws for Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Jews, Buddhists etc. These laws were codified in British India when the British came to control directly or by proxy a diverse population with diverse religions, languages and culture.
When India became an independent country, the framers of the constitution had many issues decide on in a short time and decided to punt on some contentious issues for later generations to resolve. One of them was personal law where they agreed that a uniform personal code would be desirable but left it to future generations to resolve. The other was a common national language.
Both have not been resolved. There is no uniform personal law and Hindi is not the national language.