Hacker News Reader

The very name of these teams implies at least three erroneous conceptions:

1. That the teams themselves are completely impartial.

2. That holding any sort of bias is wrong.

3. That we need to be protected from incidents of bias.

Have the universities attempted to prove any of these ideas or is questioning prohibited?

These are their tenants rather than their conclusions.

And arguing against the tenants of a belief system is likely fruitless.

Belief systems have tenets. Apartments have tenants.

Why is this belief system enshrined in universities? Doesn't this belief system itself constitute a form of bias?