Hacker News Reader

Comment by albasha | Hacker News Reader

Still, don't use AWS for your new startup. Move to it once you outgrow the offers from Linode and DigitalOcean. You'll save a ton of money.

View on HN

As a startup, how is this cheaper than the AWS free tier?[1] Once you outgrow the free tier, you'd also outgrow Linode and DigitalOcean.

[1] https://aws.amazon.com/free/

I agree, the AWS free tier is incredible for getting a project off the ground. For a side project of mine, I'm spending a little over $10/mo on AWS:

- 2x 1GB instances (one free, one $10/mo)

- Free ELB to load-balance between them

- Free 1GB Postgres RDS

Then I spend less than a buck or two a month when I spin up a c4.large for a few minutes to compile a new AMI periodically. This would all cost at least 3-4x on something like Linode or Digital Ocean.

And when the year is over, you'll be paying +$50/mo for your setup instead of $5.

Well, $30/mo. As opposed to the $40 I'd be paying DO for the same setup, except I had to do the load balancer and database myself.

AWS is incredibly convenient, but it's priced at a premium. The main cost liability to building on AWS is the cost of bandwidth is insane, 5X the cost of DigitalOcean or Linode, 10X the cost of co-location.

Of course this depends on the type of startup you are building, a video startup is gonna be crazy expensive on AWS, Non-media heavy SAAS it may not matter.

Of course you can always build on AWS and place a caching layer in front of your bandwidth heavy media using DigitalOcean boxes to save big.

> Of course you can always build on AWS and place a caching layer in front of your bandwidth heavy media using DigitalOcean boxes to save big.

This IS a brilliant idea!!

I like reactions like that to my suggestions!

I'm building a video startup so bandwidth solutions have been on my mind these days.

ermm, AWS is not just about virtual private servers.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com