Taking collective action to try and overturn your manager's decision to enforce pre-existing and clear company rules, is pretty entitled. To do that when you're an unpaid intern, suggests a high degree of entitlement to me.
Whether that justifies millennial bashing, or whether all generations are like that at 18, is another matter.
They learned how valuable they were to the company: less value than the hassle of dealing with their petition. They dramatically overrated their value, what the company thought it was already giving them, and what they deserved as a result.
Entitlement can mean various things, but in terms of acting entitled in the workplace, it's a pretty good example.
from point of view of more conservative generations or people from more conservative backgrounds the mere asking of such questions may seem like the "millennial entitlement" (a part of the traditionally more known as "questioning the authority" behavior exhibited by young generations through the history)
Being able to question fairly trivial things like dress codes seems a perfectly reasonable level of entitlement.
But a petition is a way to force an answer to a specific request on your terms, without leaving much room to listen and learn.
And dress is not trivial. It may take more than a one-sentence explanation to describe why. Consider, for a moment, that people are not robots and changing attire may have real impact on how people behave and interact in a social environment like business.
It might, certainly. But on the other hand, there are countless other issues that could be brought up—open office plans, office fraternization, expectations of late night email responses, working hours, salary, and so on—that are directly about how people behave and interact, or do business, that something like dress codes that reach no further than "may have a real impact" kinda fade in importance.
> It's millennials asking perfectly reasonable questions about why certain things are the way they are
Ah, but that's the point! The weren't asking - they were telling that this must change, because so many of us tell you so! You don't need signatures to ask a question. You need signatures to pressure.
> how forcing women to wear heels is a product of patriarchal culture and can drive women out of particular careers
I seriously doubt this is the case for "women". Some women, of course, can't stand wearing heels - just as some men can't stand wearing suits - and they choose careers where it is not customary or required. But generalizing on all women doesn't seem to be prudent. I am sure there are a lot of very motivated and driven women who won't let such things as heels derail their chosen career.
> If your only response to an office custom being questioned is to tout your authority and sneer at the insolence
If you, as an intern, question the authority of the company's management, you probably will be shown the door. There's being right, and there's being right in the right way. Hierarchies exist for reason, relationship and organizational culture are important, and the probability of an intern being so right that the company must abandon their culture and listen to the intern over the management is in general much less than the probability the intern is too green and doesn't understand a lot of things. Thus I would take an an important lesson here is that it's important not only to be right, but also to present it to other people in ways that they will be willing to accept it and that will be beneficial to them too.
If the intern's proposal is beneficial for the firm, the the firm's stakeholders should be co-opted, not bashed over the head with signatures. If it is only beneficial for the interns themselves - one would be asking, why the management should care?
My guess is that everyone has standards for politeness and they'd be annoyed when those standards are violated.
But for some reason, polite and respectful dress is considered somehow more arbitrary than, say, polite and respectful speech.
No, it isn't. They never asked about it at all, that was very much part of the point the author was making. They signed a petition demanding a change to the dress code. That is absolutely entitlement, and it is beyond naive to believe this is not more common in this generation. The generation demanding everything change so they never have to hear an opinion they disagree with.
>like how forcing women to wear heels is a product of patriarchal culture and can drive women out of particular careers (disclaimer: I have no idea whether that was the case here)
You do have an idea if you simply read the article. But no, lets try to shoehorn more identity politics in, we can never have enough!
These employees didn't have a functional dress code and it didn't seem to be in service of a brand. They were petitioning to wear reasonable footwear. And whole you may shy from such discussions, dress codes disproportionately impact women and transgender people, so it's no surprise that we note that impact.
It's also worth noting how quick Americans are to dismiss any collective action as "entitlement" to be derided. It is not a new phenomenon.
Some parts of the culture pay more attention to stuff we cover ourselves with that others. Maybe in some places what tattoo you are wearing on your cheek is much more important than what cloth you are wearing on your feet, but in many Western workplaces that's how the culture works. Substantiating culture from rational principles is very hard (why is it ok for Western people to eat chicken but weird to eat parrot? Because. Why it's ok to women to wear pants but weird for a man to wear a skirt? Because. Why we use zippers and not codpieces, why we once wore wigs and hats and now we rarely do so? Because!).
That doesn't mean culture doesn't exist or it is just stupid (unless you think whole life is stupid - which is a valid approach, but then there's no reason to single out this part of it ;). And for people that probably heard words like "diversity" and "tolerance" every day in the school, it should not be hard to understand the value of not dismissing other's culture as "this is just a stupid prejudice" and not approaching it with the posture of "now I'll show you how to do things properly". If a western person did it to a non-western person, they themselves would call it "cultural imperialism" or something like that. But they did exactly the same and don't even have enough self-reflection to realize that. That's a major failure of their education, and hopefully this life lesson would work to correct it at least partially.
> It's also worth noting how quick Americans are to dismiss any collective action as "entitlement" to be derided
It is also worth noting how some people think if 10 people do same thing it is somehow better than one people doing the thing - somehow "collective" is better than individual.
[1] https://hgwlorenzo.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/namba4.jpg
This isn't forcing women out of their hijab. This is letting interns wear sensible footwear and not wear blazers in the summer.
Maybe it is sensible to slightly alter the dress code, maybe not - it's not the point. The point is the interns failed to even realize what the issue at hand it - they just assumed everybody by them are being stupid and only wait for them, straight out of the hight school, to set them straight. Sometimes it's exactly the case, but overwhelmingly more often it is not. Even where it is the case, changing the established culture is very hard, it's much easier to grow your own to replace it.
Linux wasn't born as a division of Microsoft that convinced Bill Gates to change his ways. And if you ever want a bank where bankers are barefoot and wear pajamas, it may be a coolest idea ever that will upend all the banking world - but don't expect the president of Wells Fargo or Chase to be excited about it. That's just not how culture works.
Why are you asking me this? I have nothing to do with it. I am not talking about dress codes, petitioning is the problem. If you don't like the dress code, try asking why it exists. We have no idea what value it was adding, because the person involved who had absolutely no experience and was there to learn, never bothered to learn. They just created a petition.
>dress codes disproportionately impact women and transgender people, so it's no surprise that we note that impact.
Again, trying to inject identity politics into everything is disgusting and contemptuous. Quit trying to pull a victim card out to declare yourself special, and thus nobody else can understand the "impact".
Heaven forbid people express a mutual desire clearly to their management. Far better to be shot down individually so the manager can control the message to their management.
> Again, trying to inject identity politics into everything is disgusting and contemptuous.
It is not politics. Brexit was politics. This is societal contracts.
No, common etiquette forbids it. A guest given an opportunity is not in a place to make demands, especially without even bothered to ask about what they are demanding first.
>It is not politics
And yeah, I know the term. Another manufactured social conservative term for human rights without saying those words.