The original source of this comes from: http://supportprecisionagriculture.org/nobel-laureate-gmo-le...
Which obviously is from an NGO created by the GMO lobby. They are free to expose arguments but ending in "we consider this a "crime against humanity"" is this fallacy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion
I am not against GMOs but either for it. In the end is going to improve lives, but in the process experimentation will harm others(like with X-Rays with pregnant women, nuclear radiation, substances that are mutagens).
People are dying in India for lots of complex reasons. It is not going to be solved because of "Golden Rice". India has very fertile land, when I worked there as a volunteer the problems came mainly from overpopulation, pollution and inequality in big cities.
By "overpopulation" I mean "people against people" fighting for resources. Like Buddhist against Muslims, Rich versus poor or poor against poor, like people cutting legs or removing eyes from children so tourist feel sorry and give those bastards(that legs cutters) money.
I wonder how many of those Nobel laureates have lived in India, are Indians or have worked with them. Looking at a glance the names it seems the list contains more or less zero Indians names, so they have total ignorance in the specific problem.
Talking about 2050...by that time nuclear war could had been destroyed the entire wold, the West could had collapsed because of derivatives and debt weapons of mass destruction financial instruments, we could be using nuclear fusion for cheap energy in order to plant on Sahara dessert or Australia, or just using LEDs indoors in order not to need GMOs or pesticides...