You know, I have a lot more sympathy for the under-privileged and the under-served who have politics with which I disagree when I see articles categorizing them as losers. Maybe sympathy is a good lesson here.
Still, your point is generally valid
The author here is attempting to be clever by turning around and using the same trick against them. I wonder if it had the desired effect...
Don't use other people's argumentative frames if you actually disagree with them.
[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/06/24...
I'd expect this level from a troll on twitter, but there were times WaPo was better than that. Not anymore.