https://youtu.be/TX1rxPBTyEY?t=1m
It has been recycled over and over again, particularly in trailers. It's like the Wilhelm Scream... once you start looking you'll start noticing it (and its homages) constantly.
https://youtu.be/dZ0dH5qv1mA?t=1m23s
https://youtu.be/-bBay_1dKK8?t=59s
https://youtu.be/jdl6eAIx2K4?t=1m35s
Also, obligatory Venture Bros reference ;) https://youtu.be/K0iTfasIpLc?t=1m34s
Listening to them side by side they are not really the same at all. I think the Hitchhiker's version is just a comically extended version of it.
The ending of this piece reminds me of the ending of Symphony no 4 - with a quiet delicate bell sound, after starting with a grotesque, whacky march.
(A) start: https://youtu.be/I7U2WzC47sQ?t=246
(B) ending: https://youtu.be/I7U2WzC47sQ?t=3488
How did he go from A to B?
Edit: Here's the interview. https://youtu.be/U8bv0QDLI7M?t=481
James Horner thought he’d have six weeks to write
the musical score. Instead, he had three weeks,
and had to write some parts overnight. The movie
was behind schedule, not even finished being
filmed (let alone edited) when Horner arrived in
England. What’s more, the recording studio he’d
been provided with was outmoded, not equipped to
handle the synthesizers he wanted to use. Horner
called the experience a “nightmare,” and ended up
writing the climactic musical cue overnight.
Coming away with the impression that a James
Cameron film was too stressful and rushed, he
figured he’d never work with the director again.
And he didn’t ... until Cameron approached him for
Titanic. (That rushed Aliens score earned Horner
an Oscar nomination, by the way.)
It seems like there's a Machiavellian lesson there. There's a lot of great "making of" material on Aliens, which shows James Cameron being a genius on other aspects too.Some of my worst work has been done in the same conditions though, especially with regard to "technical debt" though I suppose that doesn't apply to the processes in film making as future maintenance is much less of a concern.
To me, this completely clarifies his conflict with Ridley Scott. The director doesn't care at all about #2. And yes, Scott is right: no one is as close to the film as the director and editor. It's not their job to pad the composer's portfolio, although ironically it seems the composers are rewarded for this "tight coupling" that they strive to avoid.
p.s., I never saw Alien, but I liked the OP and I am a Jerry Goldsmith fan from the Star Trek scores, which I used to love listening to on CD. It seems he was happier with those collaborations because he was allowed to express the "romantic" view that he had of human space exploration.