Jeremy Corbyn is already taking flak for this outcome: http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/24northnational/Labour-inq... https://next.ft.com/content/a035f3d2-39c4-11e6-a780-b48ed7b6... http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/jeremy-corbyn-blamed-f...
As much as London is Labour supporting it's only a very small part of their supporter base, their traditional heartlands are Wales and the North of the UK, both of which overwhelmingly voted to leave.
It's a conflict that cuts through both parties and perhaps it is better described in terms of cities versus rural.
Especially thinking that all decisions will be calm, collected and will result from evaluation of all sides
Most people will base a vote on false facts, spite and stuff like "following their heart"
One problem in the UK was that people were answering different questions to the one asked.
Does that money go to the EU? Yes.
Would that money be freed up for other uses? Yes.
Would some of it end up being reallocated to the NHS? Very likely, given the politics of the UK.
If you'd said ALL of it WILL go on the NHS then you'd be right, but you aren't arguing with that statement.
Oh and by the way even Nigel Farage has said it's not like that http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/eu-referendum-...
https://twitter.com/mgtmccartney/status/746245181532418048
"Let's give our NHS the £350 million the EU takes every week"
https://twitter.com/mgtmccartney/status/746245181532418048
"We send the EU £350 million a week
Let's fund our NHS instead"
The clear implication is that £350m per week is available, and that it will be spent on the NHS.
£350m is the gross figure, it ignores the > £200m per week we get back.
There is not going to be any increase in NHS funding. Anyone who voted leave because they thought there would be an increase in NHS funding hasn't been paying attention - the NHS has seen deep cuts in recent years and those are only going to get worse after Brexit.