Clinton IT specialist invokes 5th more than 125 times in deposition

Without commenting on the whole matter, isn't the "125 times" kind of irrelevant? It seems intended to sound bad, like you're hiding a lot more by invoking the fifth 125 times than, say, 5. But if someone has decided they're going to "plead the fifth", then they'll invoke it for every related question asked. Apparently there were 125 of those.

A closed door deposition with a "conservative watchdog group"?

Not that I like the facts that have emerged around HRC's private email server, but this particular instance looks more like a witch hunt than an attempt at transparency. If I had to talk to "watchdogs" who have been hounding my boss for the last 30 years (with varying degrees of justification), I'd plead the fifth too.

“However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.”

The fifth amendment is one of the most brilliant devices ever created in law - and you should always take advantage of it