Google employees are adding 'Lady' to their job titles to fight sexism
theverge.com
theverge.com
But something feels a little contrived about the hoopla around this.
In my experience with shareholder meetings you have a blend of sophisticated investors interested in the true financial performance of the company on the one side.
On the other it's sprinkled with tiny shareholders who literally have nothing else to do in the middle of the day and are looking for some excitement.
If you're a shareholder, eg you own one share of stock, you're allowed to attend and ask questions.
Since the media has not identified the shareholder (anywhere I can find) my assumption is that this is some grizzled wingnut small shareholder making a nonsensical statement that the media LOVED and grabbed onto to fit like a puzzle piece into a controversial narrative and drive clicks.
Not bad that it's highlighting the issue, but let's understand the context that the media leaves out - eg this is not an institutional investor!
Unless he knew what he was doing? That raises a number of other questions.
"Minutes after Alphabet shareholders rejected a proposal to disclose more information about gender pay equity at Google, a shareholder stepped forward to ask whether Alphabet's stock price was under- or over-valued by Wall Street."
"Prithee Lady Developer, whilst thou gander at user story 493 and comment on it before the morrow?"
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-holding-lady-day-2016-...