Puppy (or, details on Joel Spolsky's retirement from blogging)
joelonsoftware.com
joelonsoftware.com
Couldn't agree more. I agree with these ideas 100%, but it's getting to the point where they're all beginning to feel cliched.
You need to say the same thing over and over to refine your own understanding and presentation. You need to do this not just once, but periodically thereafter, because the thing you believed in 2007 will be different when you restate it in 2010. Experience has taught you things since then.
You need to say the same thing over and over because students don't learn it all the first time. They, too, grow in experience over time. When I reread the things that I read twenty years ago, I see completely different nuances than I did before.
But, most importantly, you need to say the same thing over and over because most people didn't hear you the first time, and even if they did, the world keeps making more people. If nobody ever reposts or retweets the classics, they rapidly become forgotten. (And then they aren't classics anymore: The reason classics are classics is that people can't stop quoting them.)
We've "all" heard that NDAs are worthless and that execution matters... and yet prospective clients keep pulling out those crazy NDAs. We've all heard that agile development is better than waterfall... except for the thousands of programmers who are working on waterfall projects right now. We all know that there is No Silver Bullet, and yet silver bullets continue to appear and continue to be touted, almost 25 years after the original essay.
It's okay that Spolsky himself no longer feels called to the vocation of patiently teaching the same things, over and over, to new generations of programmers and entrepreneurs. That job is not for everyone, and he's got a few other things he could be doing. ;) And it's also true that the web does a miserable job of segregating the newbs from the old hands, such that it's hard to avoid hearing lessons repeated more times than you really want to. But however much Spolsky may not need to write the 18,001st restatement of No Silver Bullet, there are always going to be people who need to read it. We're never going to finish the job of teaching people. They aren't born knowing.
Well said. A corollary is that Joel was unfairly labeled a "blogger" even though he never really blogged.
A blog is a reverse chronological list of short posts. Readers often assume a kind of exponential decay of usefulness, where old blog posts are far less interesting and relevant than new ones. Consequently, tech bloggers keep posting the same content, as if to say pay attention to this, it's still important.
What we really need is a new label for content like Joel's, one that doesn't carry any negative stigma for text written long ago. I have no suggestions for what that might look like, but I have to imagine there's something better than the status quo, which is:
(1) People keep posting the same stuff, and (2) I send around a giant, growing list of old articles to every newly minted CS graduate I meet
But blogs, including Joel's, display the "updates" page as if it were the main website. There are sometimes other views, like by tag, or on Joel's by topic in the sidebar, but they're positioned as clearly secondary, just pointers into the primarily-chronological blog. They aren't the default display, and posts are still prominently formatted with the date, as if they were journal entries--- on Joel's blog, the posting date is even on the same line as the title, in font that's just as big.
Collection of essays?
I see what you did there.
...
But, most importantly, you need to say the same thing over and over because most people didn't hear you the first time, and even if they did, the world keeps making more people. If nobody ever reposts or retweets the classics, they rapidly become forgotten."
I don't disagree with you. However, there is such a thing as overdoing it. And I feel that it's just as dangerous to do that as it is to not repeat yourself enough. After all, in saying something too many times, you're diluting your message.
Plus, posting these things on Hacker News is preaching to the choir. The companies that use NDAs probably aren't going to read hacker news. Neither are the "waterfall" developers.
I read Hacker News out of habit now, but it's not nearly as enjoyable as it once was. Perhaps I'm just getting old, but I remember the intellectual stimulation of scouring the web for great blog posts around 2002-2004. You know, before people worried about ensuring the content was search-engine optimized, or if they'd be able to sustain the Slashdot (or I suppose Digg/Reddit) effect. There was something special there and people seem to have lost it as they rushed to implement Google Analytics and ensure that their readership kept growing.
you can consume a blogpost in about a minute, maybe two. during an hour lunch break you can probably finish 20-30 posts. I found that the internet really isn't that big. There's only so many ways to way NoSQL > Sql , or scaffolding is the second coming of Christ, or how to give your VC the perfect handjob.
Even with a billion or two people available to you on the net, there just isn't all that much unique stuff. Ya, you've got 5 reasons your startup failed, but they always boil down to "My cofounder didn't work as hard/wasn't as smart as me/I should have listened to PG."
The internet itself has basically revealed itself to be 1) A great way to buy books, 2) a replacement for your encyclopedia and 3) porn.
The concept that the internet has "more" ideas is bunk. There are just more people.
Please do read some of the better authors on the subject and acceptable levels of exercise for the next 12 months.
I know you'll still be around, Joel, but thanks for what you've done this far.
But I agree with and appreciate the need to do something different - good on you Joel - and thanks for everything. And don't let the VC's eat your soul (unless for a very good price - puppies can get expensive quickly).
Funny coincidence that he mentioned him in the article, as one of his forerunners. Maybe it wasn't coincidence.
b. That is a nice puppy, Joe but you have to make sure you give him proper exercise. It is not nice to keep a dog like that cooped up in an apartment.
a) Fuck you for making me feel like I am neglecting them.
b) Thank you for making me think long and hard about the decisions in life that really matter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bikeshedding
I'm sure Joel can work out how to raise a husky and keep it happy and healthy without all of us giving our 2c
I adopted a dog and i don't exercise him nearly enough. The other option? He'd be dead. Fucking dead at two months old because people like you think animals need the perfect life.
http://fora.tv/2008/12/12/Mike_Rowe_on_Discovery_Realization...
It's quite annoying given that there's a lot worse that can happen to a dog than being owned by an attentive and intelligent owner in less than ideal circumstances.
Yes, I'm aware that huskies in the Iditarod do that much running. But frankly, those dogs are athletes, burn ~11,000 calories per day [1] and would break very quickly if you expected them to do that indefinitely.
[1] Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iditarod_Trail_Sled_Dog_Race
I wasn't sure what Joel's reason for giving up the blog would be, but I agree that not wanting to re-hash the conventional wisdom is a good reason.
I look forward to seeing what's in store for the next 10 years.
Hey! I think this my first front-page post on HN. So one more thing to thank Joel for.
That said there should be a graveyard for old blowhards. An invite only site where we can send our stalwarts who can lend a post or two a year. Collectively there would be no pressure to post but we could keep their insight on life support.
(Cute dog.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3o5APFI6kH0#t=6m41s
(spoiler: Truman Show)
- they need a lot of exercise everyday (like a few hours)
- they need training (not good couch potato dogs)
- they need high and secure fencing (many will try to escape if left alone and to their own devices and they are master escape artists)
...
Jeez, people, lay off with the dog advice already. You don't know enough about the situation to advise meaningfully.
bugs repeated advice on exercise would, if applied, make sure that Joel's dog leads a short, uncomfortable life due to the kind of overexercise that compounds the kinds of hip problems that already lead to shortened lives in large breed dogs even when exercised properly. Do NOT overexercise a puppy. Especially a large breed puppy.
That said, don't take advise from the internet. Not even mine. Not even if it is from the vet sitting next to me since, while she may be a vet, this is still the internet. Talk to your own vet about what is right for your dog.
I'm happy to hear that Joel knows what he's doing, and apparently has a ridiculously big apartment. :) However, if a comment in this thread makes anyone think twice about getting a husky puppy, then it was worth it IMO. Sorry if those statements come off as nosy, that's not really the intent.
I have had huskies that could and would run for hours on end with no sign of slowing (as they should be able to) and currently have a husky akita mix that takes full reign of five acres.