Hacker News Reader

Oh, I totally missed that the MPL makes you deliver source with binaries. I think I had it confused in my head with the Apache License 2.0 somehow.

OK, I'll admit that this is in fact clearer than the Mosh approach. (My main confusion was whether you expected me to offer source if the only binary I distributed was an iOS app; the Mosh waiver is very clear about that.)

View on HN

"Provided that you are otherwise in compliance with the GPLv3 for each covered work you convey (including without limitation making the Corresponding Source available in compliance with Section 6 of the GPLv3)..."

Yes, the expectation is that you still have to comply with the GPLv3 (including making the corresponding source for your derivative work available), at which point you have the additional freedom to distribute the app through the app store.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com