#1: Novartis: Economics, MBA
#2: Pfizer: BS chemical engineering, chartered accountancy
#3: Roche: economics, law
#4: Sanofi: MD
#5: Merck: veterinary medicine, PhD
So a person who didn't know any better might not assume a science degree was necessary.I'm really curious what sort of path takes someone from training to be a vet to heading up a global pharmaceuticals company.
Lately there's been a trend towards thinking that management is somehow separate from doing things. It's a somewhat anglo-saxon thing, you'll find it less in the Germanic world.
It doesn't matter if their tech may one day only require a microlitre of blood to do a blood test. It doesn't work today. They were trading in the market as if it did. That can't be handwaved away. That fact isn't under dispute. That's according to several of Theranos's own current and former employees.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Scientists know this. The fact that Theranos's board lost all it's scientific leadership in July 2013 has been widely cited as a major contributing factor to this debacle. The judgement to not make those false claims is what running the company has to do with science.