a16z spends much more than most VC firms on providing all kinds of services (such as recruiting) to their portfolio companies, and hires a ton of people for that purpose. It's not clear whether those expenses come out of the management fee or not.
a16z spends much more than most VC firms on providing all kinds of services (such as recruiting) to their portfolio companies, and hires a ton of people for that purpose. It's not clear whether those expenses come out of the management fee or not.
1. A portion of the profit that a16z made from previous exits.
2. This is a less likely option - asking portfolio companies to pay for those services. I know VCs that bill their portfolio companies for certain professional services.
A16Z has a lot of in house partners that focus on things other than just investments.
Edit: Just want to say that the top funds do not charge for these services. Some funds do - they invest and then you pay them back a bunch of money for services.
None of these firms that charge their portfolio companies are the typical valley top-tier funds, but I do not think it means that charging portfolio companies for professional services is a bad thing.