The question then only becomes, is the phone's DAC connected to the USB-C connector, or did the manufacturer omit it to save a few traces in the board? Did anyone test that Moto-Z with a passive USB-C to 3.5mm socket adapter, to see what happens?
The question then only becomes, is the phone's DAC connected to the USB-C connector, or did the manufacturer omit it to save a few traces in the board? Did anyone test that Moto-Z with a passive USB-C to 3.5mm socket adapter, to see what happens?
If there's no standard way to communicate that "yeah, the sideband pins are now analog audio out from the host", I don't think you can buld USB-compliant accessories that assume that.
This would mean that the adapter (and/or low-cost headphones, I guess) would still need to include a CPU that can speak USB to negotiate with the host about the sideband pins, would be my assumption. A bit like how max current (used to) work.
In that case, the article is wrong because the USB 3.1 spec already supports analog audio via the Audio Adapter Accessory Mode. Whether this phone supports this mode is unclear, but it's part of the existing spec explicitly to allow passive USB-C to 3.5mm adapters
Official spec: http://www.usb.org/developers/docs/
page 166 of the USB-C spec: http://www.those.ch/designtechnik/wp-content/uploads/2014/08...