BlackBerry hands over user data to help police 'kick ass,' insider says
cbc.ca
cbc.ca
One of them is now the "Manager of Law Enforcement Operations" at Kik. She describes her job as involving creating and fostering "positive working relationships with law enforcement and government agencies worldwide," and prides herself on "successfully manag[ing] large-scale projects from start to finish while hitting targets". Shudders.
It's amusing that the state has coerced private companies into running its apparatus. Has anybody studied the implicit "tax rate" across economies including such costs of regulation, compliance and state security?
Not that they have many (or any) fans left, but back when they were the bees knees, they were used by and often mandatory company phones for government departments and fortune 500 companies exactly because they were considered the apex of mobile security.
I know it's been a while since they were the apex of anything but jesus guys, at least pretend to try or something.
They are now called Blackberry Limited, not RIM.
I think you need to ask the company (or government agency) for their keys to decrypt their conversations over the BlackBerry system.
The consumer-mode BlackBerry stuff has long since been open to law enforcement, but the corporate communications are locked by the corporations themselves, and only they have the keys.
BBM (a consumer-level Facebook Messenger type app) is not BES (the mobile security system for corporate/government enterprises that BlackBerry theoretically does not hold keys to).
It would be like when Microsoft turns over Live Messenger and Skype IM's to law enforcement and people said "well, I guess no company will ever buy/use a Microsoft Server again". And yet, companies still buy Microsoft Servers.
That difference doesn't make this any less bad. But I wouldn't expect any major fallout from it either.
Indeed same year I'm recorded in a townhall meeting asking about QA and same manager saying, yes we will be doing that down the line.
Some brilliant and amazing technical people there in my time but darn, some serious seagull management types who failed to fly away. Interestingly most bad management I find have no technical background. Though have known good managers who had no technical background, they are rare and none at RIM that fitted that niche.
For me I feel they used Dilbert as an inspirational guide for running a business at times.
BB users by and large consider government surveillance irrelevant.
And interestingly, every single BB user I know works for the government (I'm in Canada).
There soon won't be any Blackberry to buy anyway…
For example, you can now get the Chicago's mayor's phone records by requesting it through their IT department, who asks the phone company to parse their billing logs, which includes the phone records.
Two tabs, and still a work in progress (waiting for their dns resolution logs now for the next step): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hgG79eIr8MbkjYrCvcTR...
How do you do this?
If you can't find a lawyer, find someone locally who knows FOIA very well. Lots of activism and open data crowds have loads of experience with it.
From my point of view, good riddance Blackberry. You will not be missed.
A warrant?
I doubt history will look kindly on these practices, and the story makes me even more eager to see RIM and its products in the dust bin.
He literally did not do that.
Given this, I'm not surprised BB thinks they're doing the right thing by helping governments spy on their people.
Source: I'm a Canadian who has lived in the US for 8 years. I was quite patriotic in my youth, so I've spent some time reflecting on the differences between Canada and the US.
Blackberry was a great company once, with wonderfully generous founders that donated tens of millions of dollars to fundamental physics research. No longer.
Now the Blackberry PRIV is PRIV until they say it's UNPRIV. That sounds like false advertising to me. I feel downright sorry for their customers in repressive countries.
There have been quite a few stories lately about their sales doing terribly. I wouldn't be surprised if this leak was some kind of purposeful act of desperation to drive sales by ingratiating themselves with their government and corporate accounts that see this as a feature. For shame.
I looked this up. Seems to be in the US, and also, it's just some guy using personal drugs, albeit for profit. Shouldn't even be an offense, let alone something for police to "kick ass" in.
As the article notes "U.S. law prohibits the likes of Apple, Facebook, and Google from intercepting communications on behalf of foreign agencies', in Canada it is not prohibited but should include MLAT [0] in the workflow, which would slow the process down and ensure some eyes on the request that don't have a commercial interest at stake.
BB is receiving these request from foreign operators directly.
For BB to seemingly satisfy these requests with such, well, gusto is disturbing to me, both as a Canadian as as someone who does still carry a work-issued BB (a Z30, it's a great mobile device!).
[0] http://justice.gc.ca/eng/cj-jp/emla-eej/mlatocan-ejaucan.htm...
Used to be annoyed that it needed to phone home every single time I connected by Wi-Fi. There is also a security vulnerability on port 4455, can't remember what it is called though.
The guy who created Ghost Commander ( https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ghostsq.co... ) ported it over to the Playbook. It is the only thing keeping that tablet usable.
BlackBerry will turn over BBM messages in the same way that the phone company will turn over SMS messages, and Microsoft and Yahoo and Google will turn over email messages.
All of those companies have to operate within US law. The controversy here is related to how BlackBerry is cooperating with less-friendly foreign governments.
Selling my almost brand new PRIV. 450$. PM
If we're open about it nothing is really secure anymore. Nothing can really provide us with security atm, i would even hesitate to trust a company like blackphone.
I side towards abstiance, use an older dumb/feature-phone thats less likely to have backdoors (downside is its less likely to have the latest security updates). Dont send revealing photos, dont carry a gps tracker with you. Remove your presence for the web, stop providing companies with all your data (facebook etc) and actually meet people face to face for your conversations.
The only argument i can think of against the above is that people want to listen to their music and audiobooks on the go. Simple solution, get a feature phone which can support that or accept that your life is now open to everyone who wants to know everything about you.
Like a Canadian hockey team Blackberry insists they invented the game, but every time they get to the playoffs they choke because they're just so overwhelmed at being invited.
Any interesting engineering they might have done in the past is dwarfed by their farcical inability to turn it into something people actually wanted.
It's just all so....canadian.
Well, you did say people not monsters.