Scientific reasoning can only apply to something once we can ask counterfactual questions and make counterfactual guesses ("What happens in situation X? How about Y?") about the something. Unfortunately, the kinds of people who talk about a "Hard Problem of Consciousness" do not even respect causal reasoning, and at least half of them are outright mysterians, so almost nobody has bothered to come up with "What happens if...?" questions regarding qualia for scientists to even begin investigating.
As such, most scientifically-trained individuals will simply refuse to treat "qualia" as a real concept. And they've got a point! Something with little to no causal role (remember, epiphenomenalism of the kind necessary for "p-zombies" to be possible requires that consciousness has zero causal role whatsoever), something that can be "observed" in only one way and which is not even fully observable in that way (because no counterfactuals can be had)? Yes, to a well-trained mind that sounds like nonsense.