Indian Students Lured by Recruiters Asked to Leave University
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
Perhaps, in some cases, general diligence was also an issue but a lot of it was just a total disconnect with respect to (especially quantitative) skills. When someone comes up to you and requests (I still remember this many years later) "I need you to teach me about graphs" (the simple X-Y version), it's hard to know where to even start.
Why will you admit such students in the first place? This is a lapse shown by the admissions office. Paying recruiters to find students, giving students spot admissions - these are questionable practices the university shouldn't indulge into.
Why is this a story?
Which is pretty disingenuous. Even for citizens I've seen universities admit students to programs who have little to no chance of graduating.
Yes, this is very common in unfunded graduate programs (ie, for which students are on the hook for the full tuition).
Unlike undergraduate programs, these get far less scrutiny, and it's also much harder to compare success rates, because programs are often specialized and employment rates aren't always as indicative of the value of the graduate degree as they are for undergraduate education.
I guess India is highlighted because most/all of the students were recruited from India?
Yes there are unqualified students everywhere but clearly some countries will have fewer because of enforcement of standards.
Hell the headline using the word "lured" puts the blame on the univerity/recruiters.