Does anyone else get the sense that there is an increasing number of spelling errors and typos in otherwise excellent articles produced by otherwise excellent publications? Most are small and trivial, and exactly what would get past a spell-checker, but not a capable proof reader.

For example:

    > ... without their
    > bosses every knowing.
             ^^^^^

I'll have to start making a note of every article I read and see just how many do have such errors - it might just be selection bias.