How Dirty Is Your Air?
technologyreview.com
technologyreview.com
The level of particulates middle-class people face indoors in the worst urban environments is tiny compared to the level of particulates people face (esp. in rural areas) wherever cooking is done indoors over a wood fire. We’re talking about a level of wood smoke filling the room which causes eyes to redden and start watering, and makes it physically difficult to breathe. (Source: my parents are anthropologists and my godparents are indigenous rural Mexican peasant farmers, and I spent lots of time growing up sitting next to wood-burning hearth fires.) On average, by historical standards, humans’ current exposure to particulates is very low and continues to drop every year.
I don’t know if it makes sense for people to freak out about cooking eggs in their houses, though having effective indoor ventilation is obviously worthwhile, all else equal.
Edit: I looked up the actual WHO source (not linked in the OP): http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/air-pollut...
> After analysing the risk factors and taking into account revisions in methodology, WHO estimates indoor air pollution was linked to 4.3 million deaths in 2012 in households cooking over coal, wood and biomass stoves.
This is not talking about people using a gas range with an underpowered ventilation hood to cook eggs, and the 4 million deaths number is not restricted to urban areas. The people dying here don’t need a little electronic air quality detector, they need electrification and rising incomes so they can afford better heaters and stoves.
To cut outdoor air pollution, we should get people to stop burning piles of trash, stop using fire to clear large areas for agriculture, switch away from coal power plants as soon as possible, and try to get the worst polluting old vehicles off the roads.
Still no reason not to be optimizing our environments a bit more than the usual person might. There are less obvious threats to respiratory health in the developed world but the ones that are left are probably more insidious e.g. radon gas, VOCs from paints.
Having cooking fires sucks for the women tending them in the Third World but most family members probably aren't in the house/hut for most of the day. They're probably engaged in plenty of physical activity outdoors. We on the other hand are sitting in places with artificial florescent lights and are in the same spots on a consistent basis.
We should:
- have natural sunlight (using my magical heliostats)
- run about more
- be surrounded by plants (perhaps visits from cool animals)
I should start a minor religion.
http://thewirecutter.com/?s=air+purifier redirects to http://thesweethome.com/reviews/best-air-purifier/
Keep your environment's air clean while retaining the heat plus circulating fresh oxygen.
I intend to get a decentralized HRV like Lunos for my passive Tiny House. Any problem regular houses have with air quality, will be multiplied in a Tiny House without proper precaution.
I'd expect both to be readily processed by macrophages, without harm, unlike the soot particles produced by burning either wood, coal or petrol derivatives...
£29, hooks up to usb somehow. I've yet to get it and try to figure drivers.
I'm now trying to find a cheap NO2 sensor. Those seem to be the main categories that do people in in London. The Guardian figured 3,537 deaths for pm2.5, 5,879 deaths from NO2 in 2010 approx.
Ideally what you need is a machine that can take different measurements: wind speed and direction, temperature, humidity, VOC levels, ozone, nitrogen compounds and general particulate matter.
A static network of sensors is a great start, but your measurements basically define a surface. What you'd want is a fleet of drones which could "stand still" in formation, let's say a 50 x 50 x 50 drone cube each 1m apart, and take volumetric + time measurements. That would be _awesome_ :)
The pollution seems fairly spread out so I'm not sure how much having higher resolution would help. I think those are government/council owned.
I was toying with a commercial service where householders could pay a bit for measurements on their homes and could try to counter bad stuff with filters and the like. Not quite sure about the economics - the cost of sensors seems to be dropping rapidly. The government monitoring stations I think are like $25k but there's cheaper stuff out there.
https://www.amazon.com/UNI-T-UT938C-Detector-Thermometer-Tem...
or slightly lower priced slightly older version on eBay
http://www.ebay.com/itm/UNI-T-UT-338C-Indoor-VOC-PM2-5-Air-Q...
BTW - anyone have recommendations for an air purifier with a true HEPA filter?
It has good reviews on Amazon, but it's not cheap.
Edit: but they are US based so shipping may be equally expensive to the UK.
Living in China I've measured particle count way too many times with different sensors. :)
MIT Technology Review Magazine
Better than your average clickbait, but yeah cliffhanger-as-headline is a cheesey tactic.I still enjoy this site, as a serious indicator of regional, population-center-oriented indicator of air quality: https://plumelabs.com
People with wealth probably imagine themselves immune to the problem as they have a cleaning staff but that is not true either. They need to watch out with new cars and new houses. These should be ideally left alone for up to six months so the off gassing of paints, lacquers, chaulking can happen and also the dust level from construction can die down.
Dirty air will grind your respiratory system down. Your lungs. You need those to breathe.