According to Forbes, Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes now has a Net Worth of Zero
forbes.com
forbes.com
I wonder if they apply this type of thinking for other potential-high-net-worth founders, who are likely to have most of their potential-worth tied up in a single organization. Surely this rule about treating the net value of such stock as being very low unless/until there was some kind of public sale or it had otherwise been crystallized somehow means that this type of founder will never feature in the rich list going forwards?
That won't make you turn off your adblocker.
Wonder how much weight this holds
Given such generous valuation and multiple does that means Theranos' revenue is just somewhere between $8M (100x as Uber) or $800K (less fund ever raised)? That would be pathetic.
If you've got a billion dollars in paper money, I don't see it as far-fetched that you could turn that into a few hundred million of cold, hard cash with some basic financial advice.
Its no more of a leap than the earlier peg at $4.5B
"CHICAGO — December 1, 2015–Basecamp is now a $100 billion dollar company, according to a group of investors who have agreed to purchase 0.000000001% of the company in exchange for $1."