"Twitter and Facebook aren't violating your free speech rights. They just think you are an ahole and are showing you the door."
"Twitter and Facebook aren't violating your free speech rights. They just think you are an ahole and are showing you the door."
http://sealedabstract.com/rants/re-xkcd-1357-free-speech/
"With the right of free speech comes the responsibility to extend that right to others. Because if we leave who is heard to simply 'who can speak the loudest'... we won't find out when we're wrong."
I feel like this is covered in the link I posted!
https://heatst.com/entertainment/angry-video-game-nerd-james...
But Twitter et al. support that sort of hate speech, while my opinion would be happily suppressed because of all of the hate people would stamp onto it.
For example: Not liking a gathering of wives of KKK members is not the same as not liking all women.
The first trailer was terrible. I think almost objectively terrible. It's clearly a ghostbusters movie, but it didn't seem to give me any reason to want to see the movie. It made it look like a cash-in-remake.
The later trailers have looked much better and give me some hope. We'll see what reviews say.
The original movie is a pretty great film, and I enjoyed it. I loved the cartoon as a kid, so I'm interested in seeing what happens with the franchise.
If you're not interested in the movie because you don't want a remake, or you thought the trailer didn't look good, that' fine.
If you're expressing that you hate the movie only because they changed the cast for this iteration... then you start to fit into the 'angry-man-boy' category. Same if you fit in the previous category but use lots of sexist terms and slurs to describe the new movie.
And then there is group three, the worst of the groups. These are the people sending hate messages, death threats, rape threats, etc. You can call for a boycott for whatever reason you want, people will probably think you're childish. But if you're sending death threats because someone changed a fictional character in a movie you haven't even seen yet? Yeah, you've earned that label.
As for AVGN, I haven't watched the video. Given everything that's happend around the movie it certainly immediately raises my "angry-man-boy" suspicions, but again I haven't watched it. At this point the nutcases are getting so loud over this (and every other topic) that it gets really easy for people with more reasonable viewpoints (especially if not presented well) to end up lumped in.
Solution? Ban the nutcases. No one needs to be able to send death threats via Twitter. No one needs to be able to receive them. Death threats aren't free speech, they're already exempted (assuming they are in any way reasonable).
There is plenty of room for subtlety in discussions of this kind of stuff. Can white people use the n-word? What if group X suddenly decides that phrase Y is evil?
I don't care. We can decide that later. For now, let's just ban the death threats, physical abuse threats, etc. and see where that gets us. I bet it improves things a ton.
I'd say I want to see someone make a good case for allowing death threats but this is the internet and I really don't, because someone will try and I'll think that much less of humanity.
> public incitement to violence or hatred ...