Interesting idea but I wonder why this technique is stated new since it looks very easy and comprehensive to me just by reading some sentences. Is this really new or is this just a bloated message containing something that isn't that hot?
Another side note: the article contains very much sentences (more than 2/3) not directly explaining the new technique. The read was not that great for me, and I guess this counts for most of the readers since it should be well known that random numbers are a hard thing. Don't get me wrong. Explaining things is great but the title doesn't match the most of the content.