US hiker 'lost for 26 days before dying'
bbc.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
Are folks not taught stuff about lighting smokey fires to attract attention, or would there have been local factors that prevented it in this case?
She had also tried to make fires using the matches and
lighters she kept in her backpack. There was a stream
near her camp, but it's unclear whether she was able to
find any food.
[1]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/05/2...https://www.rei.com/learn/expert-advice/personal-locator-bea...
Does a similar thing happen in the US?
Also seems like a perfect application for those Stingrays the police have stockpiled.
http://s9.postimg.org/umb1a3tjz/s5570.jpg
Besides 911 there are probably a few other emergency numbers in the US which are open on all cellphones, as well as the emergency broadcast system which will display push notifications on every modern cellphone in such cases as natural disasters.
LTE, however, is making this less of an issue and in theory an LTE capable phone should be able to make an emergency call from any network.
Government surveillance already has multi-band and protocol mobile tower stand-ins.
Movement is not the only thing that can cause a Doppler shift, echos, and multi-path propagation are also a pain to deal with but for the movement part phones pretty damn early started having accelerometers (way before they were used for cool stuff) in them as well as much better Doppler estimation processing at both the towers and in your phone.
At 150knots (relative speed, this will depend on the altitude and heading of the aircraft in relation to the cellphone) a 1.9ghz signal will have a Doppler shift of about 500hz which is more than enough to induce blocking of pretty much any cell network. Radiophones that allow air to ground communication to exist but they are designed for this purpose and implement quite aggressive Doppler correction which is also usually only possible when they have the flight data and they know more or less the altitude, heading, and speed of the aircraft based on the flight plan and real time flight data and can adjust the Doppler correction in real time, as without it it won't work.
P.S. Blimps would probably work.
Capturing signals and reconstructing them isn't hard when you fly special mission aircraft.
But you can't just strap a picocell to a SAR aircraft and expect it to work.
Also cellphones don't have that much of a battery life if a hicker has one its most likely going to be either off due to them being out of coverage or dead due to battery drain by the time anyone figures out they are missing.
Considering the cost of such platform and the little to no use it will bring the money is probably better invested in high resolution FLIR cameras and more aircraft since anything that could ping a phone and get its location would cost more than a civilian SAR aircraft.
I carry an inReach and find it fantastic. I've never used it for an emergency (though an emergency leading to a late-night Air Force helicopter rescue of someone in my hiking group several years ago prompted me to purchase it) but it's fantastically useful for text communication with friends and family in areas with zero cell reception, as well as (very recently added) weather forecast downloads for your precise location. And in the event of an emergency, being able to communicate details about your situation is very useful sometimes.
Also, do these work internationally? I went scuba diving in Indonesia in a place with strong currents. Saw amazing creatures, but there was a story overhanging everything about some divers that had been swept away by currents, landed on an island inhabited with Komodo dragons & had to fend the lizards off by swinging their weight belts at them. They were found a couple days later, but badly sunburned and exhausted. Amazing!
Many long distance backpackers will carry high capacity USB battery packs to recharge devices off rather than a solar charger, as they weigh less and involve less hassle and can generally last between town stops every 5 to 10 days (depending on what trail, of course).
I'm not familiar with all PLBs/satellite communicators but my inReach works internationally.
http://outthere.bangordailynews.com/2016/05/26/outdoor-recre...
This part stood out:
On the initial missing persons report that was filed, Largay’s husband itemized a number of items that he knew she’d been wearing or carrying. Under the category labeled “GPS, PLB, Compass” — the acronyms referring to Global Positioning System, Personal Locator Beacon– the responding warden wrote: “SPOT. Left at motel.” SPOT is a company that makes, among other things, satellite-based devices that allow hikers in remote areas to communicate their whereabouts to others without the benefit of a cellular signal.
So apparently she had a beacon, but for some reason she did not take it with her on that leg of the trail.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/05/25/hiker-who-died-...
It seems extraordinary that someone can step off the trail like this and get so lost so near to where they need to be.
It also seems extraordinary that a hiker of her age, carrying as little kit as she was, decided to do this alone.
It's not at all extraordinary that a hiker of her age decided to go backpacking alone (which in this case she didn't—she was with someone else who left). It's a very common thing for people to solo hike and backpack. Carrying a small amount of gear is not a problem either—it's the norm. But navigational tools of some sort, even just a micro compass and a map, are generally considered an essential.
I'm ex-military so this point is probably why I don't understand the mindset, I just had navigation slammed into me time and time again. And we weren't allowed GPS so you got it right and you learning to recover if you did screw up.
> It's not at all extraordinary that a hiker of her age decided to go backpacking alone (which in this case she didn't—she was with someone else who left).
Another articles mention she started without them and stayed at a lodge with a number of other people so definitely took the decision to go alone. I guess the buddy/buddy thing is built into me too.
> Carrying a small amount of gear is not a problem either—it's the norm.
Another article mentioned she was carrying less than the normal 35lbs. Obviously I'm not sure what the norm is so defer to your experience.
I do agree though, not packing a GPS unit with a charging mechanism was a bad move. The one time when I really needed it was the one time I was hiking in white out conditions on a very remote mountain in Cascades and my buddy had an GPS (mind you in the early 2000s, thus archaic by today's standards), Setting a way point at the trailhead made my night a lot more pleasant rather than shuffling down a mountain in a blizzard, and hoping to end up near where we started. I wasn't unprepared and had a paper map and compass, and knew eventually we'd hit a forest service road but it could have made for a very long night in the cold as we marched back to our vehicle.
In fact, I wonder if at the end, once she'd set up a permanent camp, if she stayed put because she was flat out afraid she'd get lost again if she left the camp even to go a few yards. This might have been a legitimate fear, but there is a way to handle it -- you leave "blaze" marks on the trees as you pass them so you can retrace your route. But maybe she wasn't familiar with this technique.
There are a lot of good ways to leave "telltales" you can follow once you're in a situation where you're lost. Branches forming an arrow on the ground back towards your camp, each within sight of the next, are an easy way to do it.
It's scary how disorienting the woods can be.
I was hiking in the woods in my backyard and after a few twists and turns to get around thorny areas, discovered about 20 minutes later I was hiking in the opposite direction I thought I was. It was completely dumbfounding.
If your navigational skills are poor enough that you can't trust yourself to walk off-trail without getting lost, use a passive system like running a GPS receiver during your hike so you can backtrack along its track until you find your trail.
This would almost certainly have been a case of answering the call of nature, going a very little way off-track to preserve decency, getting ever so slightly turned around to lose the trail, then an escalating series of "corrections" as it becomes clear that it's all going wrong. It's a very sombering and saddening thought.
Perhaps I'm unusual among hikers, in that I hike off-trail regularly, hunt for lost and abandoned trails for fun, and am a trailwork volunteer with the Forest Service, but I cannot understand how people get lost. If you lose the trail, you simply go back the way you came until you find it again. And yet people get lost all the time.
In a densely wooded, unfamiliar remote area, it isn't so simple just to backtrack, especially if you begin to panic.
In a way, it is similar to falling through ice, and not being able to simply find your way back to the hole you fell through. Panic plays a role.
I've seen comments from many experienced hunters/hikers how say they live/hike in the woods up there and all of them mentioned how easy it would be to become disorientated.
Here's one for instance:
https://www.reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/2r32uy...