Without meaning to be controversial, this is just for anyone else like me, who was a little uncertain what Christian Science (not that there's anything wrong with that) is :
The Christian Science Monitor is a reasonably reputable newspaper; in particular it is not generally a propaganda outlet for Christian Science or for political views particularly congenial to Christian Scientists. Some description here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Christian_Science_Monitor .
Further, regardless of whether their political views bias their reporting, it's highly unlikely that their political views biased this story.
Compared to publications like Washington Times, CSM is a paragon of virtue in the world of journalism.
Seems whenever I come upon an article from CSM it is well written and does not show an open bias.
Admittedly, I've never read their religious editorials.
Well what else am I supposed to use? My toes?
My apologies. I just joined and did not realize sarcasm wasn't accepted. It will be hard, as I am by nature a cynic. However, However, after better reviewing the welcome page here, I agree with the no drama edict. Once again, my apologies.