For me, philosophical reasons. I want to fight-back against the centralisation of Internet services. It's the same reason I run my own blog, host photos on my own server, pay slightly more for an unfiltered Internet connection and so on.
I can't 'win' on my own but its depressing that so many people are happy to jump on the centralisation because it's easy and convenient right now.
And what will happen in 10 years when you only have a choice of MegaCorp-1 or MegaCorp-2 handling all your online services, slicing and selling your personal data and bombarding you to consume more, because anyone running their own servers is a "digital terrorist"? Too late then.
My sentiments exactly. Right now email is something anyone can participate in as long as you are using software that follows the (open) standards. It is at its core an inclusive technology, despite the (disheartening) issues mentioned in this thread about the pitfalls and hazards of getting your own mail-server going. It would be a shame if we were to lose this.
On the other side of the spectrum we have the dominant instant messaging platforms, where you can only participate if you run their proprietary software and identify yourself with your pre-approved identifier (your phone number in most cases). Or the centralized social media platforms that censor according to their interpretation of what is permissible.
I understand that leaving all complexity and the burden of grokking something as abstract as networked software is something most people are glad to leave in the hands of Apple, or Microsoft, or Google; but it saddens me that those of us who do understand how this stuff works (at least in a broad sense) appear so willing to just accept the death of a free and open internet for a bit of convenience.