RoboCop is real at the Stanford Shopping Center
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
On it's own, meh, but combined with this...
>> All the information is streamed to Knightscope’s cloud software and then streamed back either to the customer’s control center, or in some cases to a mobile app held by a human security guard.
Am I the only one that feels like this is a bit of a datagrab by this Knightscope company? If there's an option for purchasers to have the data streamed directly to their servers then my concern is lessened, but I'm increasingly turned off by the relentless vacuuming up of data that is becoming so prevalent in new devices these days.
It's an interesting concept. I'm not sure how much I like it. On the one hand, it's a great reference if anything bad ever happens. On the other hand, while a mall is a public place you still don't expect to be tracked to the level of detail that such a device actually does. I know a handful of people that simply won't go there anymore.
Personally, the cell phone tracking bugs me. I do not expect that my cell signals are tracked by anyone but the phone company. This kind of technology makes me think about dropping my cell altogether. Sure it's nice to have one, but honestly I can easily get by without having one constantly attached to me. I'm not that important that people need to contact me wherever I am.
I also feel negatively about mass facial recognition. I almost understand for large events, but I'm simply not that afraid of terrorism. If we start talking about malls doing it I would just rather not be on camera. If private industry doesn't self-regulate in this regard, people will push the government for privacy and that could kill any budding businesses. If I were an investor I would simply stay away from that kind of technology.
What it really boils down to is that you have a .00000001% chance of being affected by terrorism, but a 100% chance of being affected by strongarm "responses to terrorism". The sad fact is that most of our population is cowardly and/or apathetic enough to simply accept our ever growing loss of privacy and freedom without objection (or in many cases, notice).
a surveillance drone for mall-cops. just great /s
There have been "robot guards" before, but they're for empty buildings, checking to see that they're empty and not being robbed. That's useful, since the job is utterly boring and better done by hardware. The Army was trying out a few for guarding their storage buildings about a decade ago.
There was an OECD opinion piece recently where they said on balance automation would not destroy jobs. I don't believe it. It will begin by eating these low skills jobs away and then eat its way upwards.
We're here boys, and girls, we've finally made it!
If they really wanted to stop things like school shootings and terrorist attacks, then the robot needs to actually be armed in some way, since no one is going to take this thing as some sort of deterrent.
Really, it seems mostly useful as a sort of tourist attraction rather than anything more, since it's apparently really popular with the people visiting the mall.
That said, a design based on a famous robot or cyborg would be a pretty interesting way to make one of these things fit in at a sci-fi convention or something. It'd at least help theme the event slightly more.