I mean, you're certainly not wrong. The article went from discussing the issue of going back to non-GMO on the environment to a full-on "here's the data for like 50 things that shows how awesome GMO is".

While I am certainly for using GMOs (there is too much great science behind it) this article just screams "someone paid me to write this".

I would have loved to see something much more focused on the topic at hand: large companies switching to non-GMO sugars to appease the current market forces and what this may mean as far as food production, etc could go. I mean the article touched on that a tiny bit here and there but not in any satisfying way in my opinion.