A Lincoln High teacher gets all his students to pass the AP Calculus exam
latimes.com
latimes.com
I got a 1 on the AP Calculus exam but colleges wanted a 3 or a 4 or a 5 depending on their requirements to give me credit for college calc. So I have no idea what it means to have everybody 'pass'.
I have no doubt he's probably an exceptional teacher. That AP Calculus test was really really hard when I took it a decade ago, but the metrics don't make any sense to me
[0] https://apstudent.collegeboard.org/creditandplacement/credit...
[1] https://apstudent.collegeboard.org/creditandplacement/credit...
Anecdotally when I took them 14 years ago 3+ was considered passing, and most mid-level schools took 3+ for credit except for things they specialized in, with higher tier schools requiring 4+ in more subjects.
The AP Board has a school lookup and the few schools I looked at (a mix of big state schools and more elite private universities) seemed to bear this pattern out.
NMT an hour south also gave me credits for those back a decade ago my first tie through college (though the classes themselves I think transfered as generic math or social studies credits not specific classes)
In this case it was more like griping that people who had placed out of freshman Calc because of AP did not, in many cases, understand Calculus. They knew enough to pass the Calc AP exam, but they had a very shallow understanding, so they couldn't use their knowledge in applications.
He said they really hated the push to get so many students to place out via AP, because it was only hurting them later.
We have some students with tight programs (for instance, future elementary educators) where the extra course is a big help, so there is that on the other hand.
My 5 in US History yielded 6 credits, 3 in Calc zero credits and 3 in English 3 credits.
A score of 1 on an AP exam is the lowest score possible on the exam, and represents an unqualified failure. (College Board describes it as "no recommendation": https://apscore.collegeboard.org/scores/about-ap-scores)
That reminds me of this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grading_systems_by_country
It's interesting to see where the 'pass' bar is in different countries. I've always found the 50% mark, which seems quite popular, to be rather unusual since it implies that someone who 'passed' essentially was correct on only half the material tested (which is then a fraction of the material actually taught), and in any other setting a 50% failure rate would be completely unacceptable.
I remember one test in particular in a class about heat transfer where one question was essentially "Same problem as the previous question, but now assume <something less simplistic>". My answer was something along the lines of, "Whoops, I already made that assumption in the previous question. Extra points?" The professor was kind enough to grant me a few bonus points.
That's why most degrees require you to produce a thesis, which is closer to what you'll need to do later.
source: I took AP exams last year.
> Nearly 2.5 million students took a total of almost 4.5 million AP tests overall last year. Of the test-takers, just 322 obtained every point possible on an AP test, and perfect scores were logged on 21 of the 36 AP exams. Here’s the breakdown of those perfect scores:
67 in Computer Science A
55 in Spanish Language and Culture
54 in Microeconomics
36 in German Language and Culture
22 in Macroeconomics
16 in Studio Art: Drawing Portfolio
12 in Calculus AB
11 in Calculus BC
11 in Physics C: Mechanics
7 in Japanese Language and Culture
7 in Studio Art: 2-D Design Portfolio
4 in Chemistry
4 in Psychology
4 in Italian Language and Culture
3 in U.S. Government and Politics
2 in French Language and Culture
2 in Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism
2 in Statistics
2 in U.S. History
2 in Studio Art: 3-D Design Portfolio
1 in Latin
-----
Surprisingly low numbers, considering how many hundreds of students ace their calculus tests in college.
I'm surprised however that Chinese has no perfect scores. I remember some students that had moved from Taiwan or China would take AP Chinese to get free college credits. The grammar of Chinese is so simple compared to Latin or Japanese. And from what I recall, AP Chinese tested Mandarin at a 2nd grade level, and didn't test much or any of the chengyu (成語: Chinese proverbs) of which are difficult because of the shear number to remember.
Perhaps graders could tell they were native speakers, and thus raised the bar? (I took 3rd-year Chinese as a filler class "language requirement" in college and the professor expected high-school level of Chinese while she expected chicken scratch from others for the same grade.)
AP Computer Science seems likely to have a good number of perfect scores. I remember a test reviewer telling me that they often overlooked syntactical errors (unbalanced parentheses) and would allow API calls to incorrectly labeled API functions. (I don't disagree, because CS is more about understanding data structures than it is knowing how to put code on paper without an IDE or reference.)
Did you study Latin for several years before? I think that class is typically intended for people who have already studied Latin at the high school level for three years (most likely reading Caesar or other authors first). That would give a lot more opportunity to become familiar with Latin grammar rules.
I got all the rules (declensions, conjugations, etc) but I always had trouble piecing them collectively. A lot of the declension endings would be the same (such as 4th declension nouns) and it was hard for me to differentiate between a nominative and accusative in the context of a sentence. Hence I never studied Latin in college. I'm sure the world is a much better place for that. Wow, I can't believe I am reopening old wounds from 12 years ago ;)
I genuinely believe the single perfect test score is also empirical proof of the difficulty of Latin in an English-speaking world...
I would much rather parse MIPS assembly all day than read Latin.
One of the more interesting hypotheses suggested was that Latin classes, unlike a lot of SL classes, are not nearly as "immersive" as more common ones, and a lot of the language processing hardware we've got is better at digesting from spoken immersion. (Part of that, of course, is that outside of specialized environments, we don't really have any "native" speakers; part of that is also that common "spoken" Latin was a lot simpler than the brick-by-brick construction of Vergil or Cicero.)
I also agree that the Vergil and Cicero constructions are harder than what you would hear at a spoken Latin gathering (or probably in a Latin-immersion class). The word order people usually use when speaking is more like modern Romance languages (with some tendency to put the verb at the end, but not, say, chiasmus!). That did make me think that ancient Romans probably didn't talk like Cicero or Vergil either. :-)
I always remember this line from Cicero
Magna dis immortalibus habenda est atque huic ipsi Iovi Statori, antiquissimo custodi huius urbis, gratia ...
in which "magna" 'great' modifies "gratia" 'thanks', which is the subject of "est habenda" 'should be given'. That's tricky, or at least a lot to keep in your head when trying to parse it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_Live_%281994_film%29
> The film was banned in mainland China by the Chinese State Administration of Radio, Film, and Television due to its critical portrayal of various policies and campaigns of the Communist government. In addition, Zhang [Yimou] was banned from filmmaking for two years.
I agree that it's a ridiculous question, but don't attribute that to the test being "geared towards second language learners". It's geared towards the priorities of US language teachers, which are heavily slanted towards "cultural appreciation" rather than actually getting students to know the language they're appreciating so much.
Judging by your comment, you are also a native speaker of English. Is that true? It's pretty unusual for someone who only left China as an adult.
It's not surprising if you realise that AP tests can't be gamed as easily as tests designed (and possibly graded) by those who taught the students taking the tests.
It was pretty easy to game the written portions of the test if your teacher had grading experience.
I think there's a trend of becoming a better student in college, so I don't find it so surprising to ace calculus in college.
myself as a counter example, I was an ace in high school passing 10/12 AP exams, and almost failed out of college--go figure?
How would design a uniform final exam for all, say, Calculus I courses? Sure, you can only test the intersection of all, but that encourages the teachers to only teach that subset. Instead, AP exams test the union of all, and normalize the score so that you only need, I think, a raw score of 60/100 to get a 5 on calculus. That way, teachers are encouraged to experiment with their curriculum, and students are not overwhelmed by the need to know everything there is to know. It's really a win-win solution.
A meter that is always pegged tells you nothing.
I'm pretty sure in high school, my entire class passed. It was unusual for people to fail APs. (My high school only admitted the top 2% scorers on an admission test, so it was biased towards high exam scorers.)
From the other end, the Catholic grade school across the street sent some of their 7th and 8th graders to take classes with us at the high school.
This was in the mid-90s.
http://maps.latimes.com/neighborhoods/neighborhood/lincoln-h...
caveat; this is a magnet program of about 200 students within the overall two thousand and some
LAUSD just went through a massive building/remodeling of facilities last few years. Not all schools got it but ones that were remodeled look nice. But that is after decades worth of students who went through LAUSD sitting in ghetto classrooms. After about a decade the same classes will start looking dingy and few more decades will pass before another wave of remodeling.
(My son got a '5' on the BC calc AP.)
Firefox has problems, mostly performance. But adblock and reader mode help greatly.
Thanks!
Yom says he keeps getting asked if there's some secret recipe for getting students to perform at their highest potential.
"This may sound corny, but you really have to love them," Yom says. "You build this trust, and at that point, whatever you ask them to do, they'll go the extra mile. The recipe is love."
Basically it comes down to soft skills. If people think you care about them they will care about what you want and think and help you achieve things together.
Which is like forcing programmers into a forced Agile system....it's better to focus on improving the skills of the programmers.
The guy in Stand and Deliver was similar.
I'm fine if you want to hate on the Common Core like so many, but these points are so completely unrelated this argument doesn't make any sense. We aren't min/maxing teachers like we would with our character in an MMORPG, these are human people.
1. High-stakes testing requires exam security. One must assume that the teachers and administrators, if rated on student performance, will assist cheating.
2. High-stakes testing should be spread out across the year, with the result being a running average that discards the low values. (sickness and other bad luck should not be punished) Instead of a week or two of solid testing, do an hour every other week.
3. Tests should not come from companies that sell textbooks. This is a conflict of interest. It's not good to have an incentive to use non-standard terminology to give an advantage to schools which purchase the matching book.
4. If you can't test something, and you don't mandate hours for it, it will be removed from the schedule. Ideally you'd test for everything, but testing some subjects (band, shop) is difficult. The hours must be mandated to protect the untestable subjects.
5. You get what you test for. (see #4 above) High-quality tests are a must. It shouldn't be practical to cram for a test.
Charter Schools enjoy the benefits of government bonding along with the benefits of making the owners wealthy.
Look beyond the mechanical aspects of the problem, and consider the ramifications of testing within the education system as a whole.
I don't think that approach can scale, though. You can't maintain that kind of relationship with 50 people; you need them to enforce the norm ("do the work!") on each other.
Perhaps you are biased from being surrounded by developers but It's akin to me (a non farmer) making a blanket statement like "Surely it isn't so hard to grow a tomato. Why are all these people in Africa starving?"
Yom loved the movie "Stand and Deliver,"
about legendary Garfield High calculus
teacher Jaime Escalante's success with
so-called unteachable students.oh, and similar communities. I could have gone to Garfield, the high school from Stand and Deliver, but opted for Lincoln, when I grew up in this area
Furthermore the AP exam environment, IMO, varied by the school giving it. I could have easily stored formulas in my calculator (for the calculator section), I could have easily colluded with classmates, and if my teachers wanted to, they could've easily given me the answers. It was a bit of a joke really. Multiple phones went off during the exam, no penalties were given (which I agree is the right approach, but it does say something about the exam itself).
The prestige of the AP program and the experience of taking a number of AP courses has contributed to my declining respect for our higher education system really.
While I believe our primary and higher education systems could use a lot of work, I think the AP program is at least respectable as a stepping stone into higher education, especially for communities where higher education isn't a norm or accessible.
You are allowed to do that. Proctors won't clear calculator memory.
> I could have easily colluded with classmates, and if my teachers wanted to, they could've easily given me the answers.
Proctors and/or students will likely notice that.
How did we get into this mess where our culture values sports over education? How can we get out of it?
[1] http://bigstory.ap.org/article/19cce15048484abcac18c836f8c0b...
[2] http://abc11.com/education/survey-calls-nc-the-worst-state-f...
[3] http://www.forbes.com/sites/maurybrown/2016/05/11/a-texas-hi...