Using patents like this is pretty much the patent equivalent of entrapment.
Also, why isn't Vysor just using the HMTL5 facilities to use hardware h264 enc/decs?
Using patents like this is pretty much the patent equivalent of entrapment.
Also, why isn't Vysor just using the HMTL5 facilities to use hardware h264 enc/decs?
Or the built-in Chrome API for that, PPB_VideoEncoder: https://developer.chrome.com/native-client/pepper_dev/c/stru...
Well actually, it might be okay on desktop.
But yes, I've switched.
https://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/approved-...
Not sure why improving this state of affairs would require a change in underlying patent laws. We just need standards bodies to adopt more general patent policies--which could be accomplished by preferring to use standards from orgs with better patent policies.
The problem with this is that there will always be someone who will happily say "Sure, I'll call your patent a 'standard' if you give me a little bit of money to 'certify' it."
Secondly, standards setting bodies are usually a conglomerate of members from competing companies and hence a huge political bureaucratic mess, so it's not as easy to get something into the standard just for some money.