Is this normal?
Is this normal?
That article says ~300 students, 30 posts each seems pretty normal.
1. Didn't mention it was an online course
2. Didn't mention there were 300 students
3. Claimed it was questions instead of posts
[0] posts are questions and notes
[1] contributions are posts, responses, edits, followups, and comments to followups (i.e., everything)
The course itself was very innovative in its directions and tests because it asked questions that compared and contrasted human and artificial intelligence. That not just got people's creative juices going, but also made it relatable. More than one person related the artificial learning we were imparting to the code with our own learning processes - or that of our children.
The instructors (Dr.Goel and Dr.Joyner) also used it as a chance to compare the online vs on-campus versions of the course with some interesting results (tldr: the online version was OOM better due to student participation, which was likely due to self-selection of early adopters of the OMSCS program, but still worthwhile).