I think the poster is suggesting making that decision for (presumably) his race.
Though implicit is the assumption that the natural way to group people is by ethnicity, but you could argue for grouping by country, social class, income, education, etc. For instance, I feel way more connection with techy/nerdy people who grew up similarly than I do to, say, a gang member who spent years in jail but happens to be my ethnicity.
But I note that there are consequences.
Some people justify environmental laws because of their consequences on the future of a nation. I can easily see the same logic used to prevent the "degradation" of a population.
> degradation of a population
Assuming we're talking about America (apologies if not) and segregating populations into races in america as they're recognized, I don't see how these two goals match up.
If you care about the nation of America, then the answer according to the data is to ship in a bunch of smart asians to raise the IQ.
Or am I under the false belief that anybody can be American, not just (I'm guessing since it's the majority group) white people?
Preventing interracial marriage wouldn't change a thing for the country as a whole, because people would just continue to reproduce with their own race.
Nevermind, I was wrong.
I don't see how my personal race preference could be applied to a country.