I don't see how this article adds anything over its source http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-05-09/historic-150-net-sh..., that article has strictly more information.
Can the url be changed?
Can the url be changed?
ZH has little predictive credibility; they've been wrong their entire existence. They just make a shitload of money off click-bait articles. So not a lot of people are going to be willing to go to a ZH link, but if you link to Fortune, somebody might fall for it.
Indeed. I'm not sure how reputable can a site be with several thousand non-staff "external contributors" producing content.
I've never found anything original there and typically avoid it in search results.
>Heeding the call for traffic growth, Fortune has joined the growing ranks of publishers that are opening up its site to posts written by non-staff contributors.
Each publisher has a slightly different approach, and Fortune is no different. The Time Inc. title draws from a 5,000-person contributor network who supply what Fortune digital editor Aaron Task calls “our op-ed page.”
http://digiday.com/publishers/fortune-hopes-avoid-platform-p...