* Most people don't own a .com (or .whatever) for personal use - and never will - so what are the advantages?
* The suffix indicates the capability. It wouldn't be obvious that andrewtj.com contained your contact records. I'm not sure how you could change public perception of .com/etc, but you at least have a shot at it with a TLD exclusively for this purpose.
* TelHosting providers are obligated to provide standard public APIs, and there are also specs for consuming structured data from DNS. Would you use these, or create your own?
* For people who do own a .com they most likely won't be running their own nameservers, so you'd have to persuade nameserver operators to agree on API specs and run your management software.
* .tel has a system for brokering encryption keys used to encrypt/decrypt records - if you want privacy you'd need a system like this.
* Using a common namespace offers us a publicly accessible zone - convenient!
* Marketing. Hundreds of registrars selling a common branded product gives it the best chance of adoption.
* It's actually pretty hard to do by all accounts.
I have nothing to do with Telnic - I'm just an advocate/fanboy :)
Whilst that's true, when someone decides to purchase a domain, why would they buy a .tel when there's other namespaces with more freedoms? I'd be surprised if .tel takes off in preference to .id.au in Australia for instance; — I know which domain I prefer and pay for.
* The suffix indicates the capability. It wouldn't be obvious that andrewtj.com contained your contact records. I'm not sure how you could change public perception of .com/etc, but you at least have a shot at it with a TLD exclusively for this purpose.
I'm not sure that this is as practical a benefit as it sounds. If you were to ask me what my ".tel" is and I responded, just use "andrew.tj.id.au" you'd plug it in and use it. If you were to use andrew.tj.id.au on a computer, you'd likely consume it without even thinking about it.
* TelHosting providers are obligated to provide standard public APIs, and there are also specs for consuming structured data from DNS. Would you use these, or create your own?
* For people who do own a .com they most likely won't be running their own nameservers, so you'd have to persuade nameserver operators to agree on API specs and run your management software.
* .tel has a system for brokering encryption keys used to encrypt/decrypt records - if you want privacy you'd need a system like this.
I've written a DNS server and run a DNS service so it's a bit disingenuous for me to answer these questions. That said, I would and am considering providing the infrastructure for myself and others.
* Using a common namespace offers us a publicly accessible zone - convenient!
I'm not clear on what benefit this outlines?
* Marketing. Hundreds of registrars selling a common branded product gives it the best chance of adoption.
* It's actually pretty hard to do by all accounts.
Agreed on both accounts. The later is part of the reason for my lack of enthusiasm for it.
What freedoms are you referring to?
>I'm not sure that this is as practical a benefit as it sounds. If you were to ask me what my ".tel" is and I responded, just use "andrew.tj.id.au" you'd plug it in and use it.
Fair enough, it would be great to reach that point!
>I'm not clear on what benefit this outlines?
Search. That's what I'm working on :)
>Agreed on both accounts. The later is part of the reason for my lack of enthusiasm for it.
But it works :) And from a developers perspective it's easy - there's a bunch of apps you can play with (iPhone, Blackberry, softphones, etc).
I can point the A records for any other domain anywhere I like but with .tel I'm stuck with the providers choice (or have I misunderstood?).
> Search. That's what I'm working on :)
Ah, I can see how that would be problematic. Do you have a blog or something I can follow your progress on?
Ah I see. Yes, the Address record stays pointing at the TelProxy web server (incidentally a major overhaul will be released later this month). Anyway, I don't personally see this as a matter of "freedom" - better to keep the focus on its intended purpose.
>Ah, I can see how that would be problematic. Do you have a blog or something I can follow your progress on?
andy.tel - no blog, but I tweet, mostly rubbish. :-)