The Web does not need flash.
stimuli.com.br
stimuli.com.br
It's now more than a decade old. Of course it's going to be replaced at some point. But let's keep in mind that the open source/standards complaint alternative is fourteen years late to this market, and give credit where it's due.
I am sorry I sounded angry. Besides the sensationalist title, I surely didn't intend to.
I've done more Actionscript programming than any other language, keep OSS projects with it, I am not angry at all.
I do think, however, that specially inside the agency niche (to where I belong), there is a very strong blindfold, people really believe that flash is the only tech that matters on the web. Really.
I was aiming more at agency flash devs, to try to stir up some of the signs one can pick up.
I do have a lot of frustration to vent, however, with the toolset, community (certain parts of it) and Adobe. But ironically, all 3 of these have improved greatly in the last couple of years.
Additionally it's not the lack of an open source solution, it's that the worlds most popular web browser (IE) has been off doing it's own thing, mostly reacting, rather then advancing. Microsoft's solution to Flash is their own VM/Plugin (SilverLight, before that ActiveX). It furthers their platform and technology stack.
Lastly, Adobe themselves does not have the best track record in software development. See http://adobegripes.tumblr.com
1) Ads. Animated ads. Ads that suddenly make noise. Ads that do both.
2) SKIP INTRO. (Enough said.)
3) Playing video easily on a web page.
4) Games.
Of these, only the last two are things most people want, and they see far more ads than they ever do YouTube clips.