EDIT: Just want to point out that it appears that this software allows you to define access for different members of a team, but I haven't had a chance to try it.
... and the binary format makes KeePass merges impossible. Even if it's just you, if you have multiple computers you need to make sure you have the latest copy before adding something.
That's what's nice about pass, it plays nice with git, rsync, and just about everything else. Last write wins per credential. If you tack on history with git (or ZFS snapshots!) you have a central copy that you can share among a team.
Someone should make a slick UI atop a pass directory with a browser plugin.
I've been manually merging a set of Password-Safe-format password files (one for each of my many computers) and I've been thinking about alternatives for a long while. I was actually thinking about how I could combine encrypted files with Git to get history and painless merging – I'm glad to know that someone else had the same ideas!
Sadly, Android client (which is quite good otherwise) doesn't support git-remote-gcrypt.
Why is this a limitation? Are you stating that each file in the 'repo' is encrypted separately? I figured it was the entire repo as a directory, in which case, when it's 'at rest', the whole thing is encrypted as a blob.
No, it's not.
With pass (just to be sure - we're talking about zx2c4's one, right?), the store contains a bunch of independent gpg-encrypted text files. However, the filenames are not encrypted or obfuscated by any means.
This has pros and cons. On the good side, you don't have to decrypt anything (which means, actually use your GPG key, which is best kept on an unplugged HSM) to just check if the credential's in the store (think auto-fill suggestion). Also, this architecture allows dead-simple (plain rsync or git!) approach for synchronization when there are no entry-level conflicts. On the bad side, anyone who has access to the filenames (local filesystem access or a clone of git repo) can figure out which resources you have credentials for. That's the price of the simplicity.
I.e. what you see in the very first example at https://www.passwordstore.org/ in the "Using the password store" section are the actual at-rest filenames. Run `ls -lR ~/.password-store` if you don't believe me ;)
Use of ecryptfs/encfs or git-remote-gcrypt was suggested to mitigate this, but those aren't perfect. Well, everything depends on the threat scenarios you consider.
What're the downsides or limitations of ecryptfs/encfs or git-remote-gcrypt – I was looking over Pass again and realized all of what you stated. I figured ecryptfs/encfs would work well enough to encrypt the Pass repo itself.
Things like KeePass and 1Password don't scale well for teams/businesses. There are things like admin passwords that teams need to share (as bad as it is to share passwords, there are a lot of cases where there isn't another option). You can do something like store KeePass or 1Password in Dropbox, but it has issues. The vaults have a password, everyone using it needs to know the password, and everyone gets access to everything. You can't do something like share a billing password with someone in accounting, without also giving them all the root passwords. It becomes a pain to create a bunch of individual vaults for every sharing case, and keep track of and share the individual vault master passwords.
Enterprise password managers also have audit systems. You can see every password someone had access to, every password someone accessed, and who accessed a specific password.
I don't know if Passbolt is any good, it seems like it is off to a decent start. I've looked into enterprise/team password managers at every company I've worked for in the past 10 years; I've never found an open source one I trusted -- they all drop the ball in at least one critical area. And I don't trust the closed source ones either. It is a sad state of affairs, so I welcome new entrants into the space.