I sent an email to a monk in Nepal and my blog was hacked by the Chinese
qz.com
qz.com
I would have liked to see some analysis on the prevalence of these attacks on blogs instead.
This is disappointing to say the least.
This is a Quartz and published-media-is-dying-and-desperate-for-pageviews problem.
As a publisher, the experience made me realize the potential in a service like the one from Ev Williams’s Medium.
1. Crap, my blog got hacked.
2. I'm a journalist not a cybersecurity expert. I need to outsource the task of keeping my blog secure.
3. Medium seems a promising candidate.
4. Actually, Medium looks pretty good. Let's look more closely at it.
> blog was deluged with thousands of comments
> the target was the shared hard drive
It would be nice to know what the actual attack here was. Was it really a DDOS? Did they take advantage of an out-of-date version of Wordpress to get access to the hosting account and cause some actual damage? Or did they just post a lot of spam?
Wait what?
Your blog becomes the target of common everyday run-of-the-mill comment spam, and you just immediately assume this is a State Sponsored attack? Please... you, and your blog are really not that important.
And we're supposed to just accept the Chinese government monitors all monk's email inboxes, and then launches attacks against anyone who dares email them? Ya right... If the Chinese government was going to go through that much hassle, why not just shut down or intercept/delete all inbound email coming to the monks? Or prevent the Monks from responding?
The much more plausible narrative is this blogger had an outdated Wordpress install, and some bots pwned his server in a completely unrelated scenario.
Checking his blog, he is indeed running an outdated Wordpress install (even after the attack!)[1].
And the conclusion is his blog was hacked by the Chinese. Maybe there are some correlation here but it seems too quick to jump to the conclusion that the email caused the Chinese government hacked your blog?
Maybe it is because of something you posted on your blog rather than the email?
Mattheiu Ricard has written a lot about the intersection of meditation and neuroscience, etc. Really fascinating stuff. Here's a TED talk he gave: https://www.ted.com/talks/matthieu_ricard_on_the_habits_of_h...
Therefore I prefer not having the option to add custom features.
What?
Not 100% applicable, but worth thinking about IMHO:
One dissident in the Soviet Union, I think Joseph Brodsky, said not to talk about the abuses that oppressors inflict on you. You only magnify their impact: They do those things to scare and intimidate, and every time you repeat the story you help them do it again, to an ever wider audience (who themselves will repeat it). Let their attempts to terrify their victims die, without an echo, in the room where they occur.
It's hard to oppress hundreds of millions or billions of people; you can't really control them all if they don't submit. Terror is a tool for keeping them in line.
(In fairness, it doesn't necessarily apply to this situation, and sometimes talking about things helps people organize, find support, and alert the world to the abuses. But how many people who read this story will now hesitate to help a critic of the Chinese government?)
Is this an ad?
That's quite a leap.
You're also mixing different traditions here, that all have their own perspectives on what monks can and can't do.
Materialism in the Buddhist sense is about mental attachment. Desire (attachment) stems from the mind, not the object itself (attachment is not a property of the object), and different meditation practices have different techniques to work with that mental attachment. Reducing your possessions is a very effective strategy in reducing attachment--but it certainly doesn't do anything without developing mental renunciation simultaneously. I'm curious if this is an American or Western perspective on poverty--that poverty itself is somehow liberating.
In terms of email, there's nothing luddite about Tibetan Buddhism. Technology is embraced as another avenue for speech, which the mind can be attentive to.
They also known driving Porsche, buying jewelry and more.
http://www.19lou.com/forum-269-thread-38651591-1-1.html