All that says is she was admitted to Stanford as an undergrad, and lasted there till she was 19. That alone doesn't make someone a scientist.
> a person who is studying or has expert knowledge of one or more of the natural or physical sciences.
Would she be able to test out of all her BA requirements from Stanford with what she's learned?
Not covering up the scientific questions raised by the FDA, for example, and stop pretending that all is fine in the best of the worlds.
A scientist should have scientific integrity above else, and admit they are wrong unless they can prove without doubt what they are claiming to be true.