Why conservatives are probably not stupid
randomstrings.wordpress.com
randomstrings.wordpress.com
This isn't a particularly robust article, but the point he makes is probably correct - intelligence makes one more likely to go to university, and going to university exposes one up to far more liberal influence than conservative. It certainly matches my experience. My experience has also been that the vast majority of liberals move at least a bit to the right after they grow up and have to support themselves.
(No one's ever totally objective about this stuff, but for what it's worth, I'm a moderate, to the point that I didn't feel I could vote either way in the last election.)
If you can't vote "either way," and you don't vote, then you're effective voting for (or giving the vote to) the combined LeftRight party that you can't bring yourself to vote for.
If you can't be a participant, at least be a Jammer.
Besides, the political environment is essentially driven by the "madness of crowds". You are irrelevant. Better to remain detached and regard politics like the weather, something to be dealt with as necessary.
So you would still have to explain why universities would tend to be liberal.
Anyway, nothing good can come from this discussion here. I hope it'll be flagged to death soon.
Universities in the US aren't run by the federal government, and even if they were, the party in power wouldn't have any effect on the political leanings of campus staff/faculty. We're not China.
The reason university campuses tend to be liberal, I think, is that most of the people there are A) young and inexperienced; or B) a very specific and self-selecting subset of intelligent people (professors) who are not necessarily a representative sample of all intelligent people.
"Show me a young conservative and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old liberal and I'll show you someone with no brains."
In my experience, in the USA, this is nothing other than a vague cultural affiliation and it has relatively little content. Conservative oldsters love their Medicare. Liberal Silicon Valley types are enthusiastically anti-union.
And to everyone who might call this an article, have your standards really fallen that low?
Self-defined "conservatives", on the whole, appear keen to keep things as they are and not experiment with society or civic systems. Self-defined "progressives", on the other hand, seem more willing to try out experiments to see if they result in quality of life improvements.. this fits well with a scientific mindset, IMHO, so I'll probably always identify as idealistically progressive, even if many of my opinions become conservative due to experience.
Perhaps this is evidence that despite the attempts by the american right to re-define 'liberal' to mean what most europeans would call 'centrist' or even 'center-right', the american right is actually the one harbouring fringe, ideologically-driven politics, and those they see as liberals are actually the smart, pragmatic centrists.
I actually think of it like this: being liberal doesn't necessarily make you more intelligent, but being more intelligent makes you increasingly likely to be liberal. This is why the student bodies at all the top colleges in the US are overwhelmingly liberal. No, it isn't because the teachers there are lefties; the students were that liberal the moment they stepped on campus and smart people are much less likely to be manipulated than dumb people. Once you reach a certain level of intelligence where you are able to process news from a variety of sources and interpret it critically, you easily see that moderate liberalism is right on almost all issues where there is some notion of an objective right or wrong. This is why top colleges can be over 90% democrats.
Now if you aren't intelligent enough to understand the world, you could become either liberal or conservative. It really just depends on where you grew up and your experiences. It's sort of like taking a multiple-choice test with two possible answers. If you are bright and can understand the material, you will choose the liberal answer the vast majority of the time. If you are not smart enough to do so, you have to guess at the answer. Half pick the correct liberal choice while the other half picks the incorrect conservative choice.
The only intelligent conservatives either are libertarians who have simply done the mental gymnastics necessary to conclude that other human beings do not matter or are people who have been severely indoctrinated into conservative teachings at a very early age.
"[...] Religion is the essential reason conservatives give more, and religious liberals are as generous as religious conservatives. Among the stingiest of the stingy are secular conservatives."
This latter group would presumably include most libertarians.
Summary: For various reasons the general population skews conservative, essentially driving the correlation. "Smart people" probably don't much skew liberal.