Can we then do the same for, I don't know Korea, Middle east and the like? It's their land, they can do whatever with human rights. Why talk about it?
Feel free to talk about it, but the outrage seems eminently artificial, especially given these guidelines are years old for the most part.
> Can we then do the same for, I don't know Korea, Middle east and the like? It's their land, they can do whatever with human rights. Why talk about it?
Don't you think there's a slight difference between living in "I don't know Korea, Middle east and the like" and deciding to develop for ios?
As you note, you have the freedom to not buy apple devides, to not use them, and even more so to not develop for them, you're not exactly stuck between whoever's running the place and whatever "big boy" nation has decided today was good weather for an airstrike.
What part of the guidelines being old makes the outrage '[very] artificial'?
Seems valid outrage/annoyance to me, and I didn't artificially manufacture my annoyance, there's nothing 'eminently' fake about it.
Is the holocaust less shitty because time has passed? To draw a less emotionally charged parallel, was your coffee any less bitter that one time because you drank it two days ago?
>Don't you think there's a slight difference between living in "I don't know Korea, Middle east and the like" and deciding to develop for ios?
Obviously. It's an analogy. It's not supposed to be a direct representation of the current situation/issue.
To be clear here, your response is this: they own the devices/platform, they should be able to decide every aspect of how people code/develop/hack on that platform?
A purchased device should be, given the above, owned(or at least controlled) by those who created the device, not by those who bought it?
Yes, we do have the freedom to not buy Apple products, which is why many of us don't.
Godwin Index = 4 Replies
Isn't this what you meant by 'let the market decide'?