> that are actually based mostly or entirely on statistics? You certainly get folks who throw out a number or two are part of their talking points, but rarely do you get entire articles for these sorts of positions that revolve wholesale around some purported stat.
The current right wing UK government is at present busy churning out statistics to "prove" why it's best for the UK to remain in the EU, for example.
E.g most recently they've trotted out claim of worse GDP development outside the EU.
The pro exit crowd in their own party is using exactly the same tactics in favour of their views.
Both sides have focused strongly on numbers related to how it will affect the UK economy and immigration as those two areas seems to of greatest concern to the Conservatives.
When it comes to education too, the right wing here is extremely preoccupied with numbers.
Given your proposed list of "right wing positions", it may be that what you're seeing is arguments for predominantly religious positions that are basically too extreme for most European right-wing partes that'd be my frame of reference.
Pro life, anti marriage equality, trickle down economics, abstinence-only education are all policies that are extreme fringe positions even on the right wing in most European countries (with the odd exception - e.g. stronger support for anti-abortion bills in the catholic countries, though that's crumbling even in places like Ireland), and of those only "trickle-down economics" is not tied to religion here. And trickle-down economics certainly does not survive any kind of focus on numbers, so the few people here who believe in that certainly won't drag out numbers.
War on drugs is the only policy on your list there's fairly universal support for on the European right.
Instead what we tends to see are arguments over the economy, taxes and costs of immigration, where in fact the right very often will be trotting out numbers.