to critique a political philosophy makes one a poor quality publication? what?
Politically, the article attacks conservatism and libertarianism which discourage a strong government role in regulating the economy. Within the context of economics, this is referred to "liberalism." Neoliberalism (the subject of the article) refers to economic liberalism.
I know that. I was responding to a poster who implied that critiquing neoliberalism makes one a "very poor quality publication"
To critique with either missing, invented or false arguments make a publication poor quality. In this particular case it is using all 3 types.