Show HN: I made a Hacker News for podcasts
podcastrank.co
podcastrank.co
That make it a lot easier for any of the new shows coming out that are trying to be like a Radiotopia or Gimlet style show, to be discovered.
https://gimletmedia.com/show/reply-all/
Planet Money: http://www.npr.org/sections/money/127413729/podcast/
Startup (also by Gimlet): https://gimletmedia.com/show/startup/
Excellent:
This American Life
99% Invisible
Very good:
Planet Money
The Memory Palace [historical narratives]
The Moth
On the Media
Snap Judgement
Good:
Freakonomics
Radio Lab
Radio Diaries
Occasionally good:
The Truth [fictional radio dramas]
CriminalStephen West does an outstanding job of tracing the complete history of philosophy in the West and relating its ideas to modern thought and idioms, and uses humor effectively as well.
- Lore (http://www.lorepodcast.com/)
- Limetown (http://limetown.com)
- The Moth (http://themoth.org/)
- The NoSleep Podcast (http://www.thenosleeppodcast.com/)
- Criminal (http://thisiscriminal.com/)
- Snap Judgment (http://snapjudgment.org/podcast)
- The Black Tapes (http://theblacktapespodcast.com/)
heritageradionetwork.org/series/cooking-issues/
http://rationallyspeakingpodcast.org/
http://www.microbe.tv/ (home of This Week in Virology, TWiParasitism, and TWiMicrobiology).
Seems like the scoring system could catch a lot of what you're concerned about.
http://www.programmingthrowdown.com/2014/07/episode-35-haske...
I find it incredibly obnoxious. You brought this person on to tell a story: let them tell their story, goddammit!
While on a broad reaching medium, like TV, when can accept that the presenter is trying to reach the least capable person out there in terms of understanding the message, on podcasts, being as they are so specific and targeted, doing the same just does not feel right (to me, at least).
If the presenter breaks the rhythm of a guest to explain what the guest is saying is like rubbing in your face and saying "I'm sorry you can't understand this, but I'll translate it to you". If we reached the podcast, we probably CAN understand what the other person is saying.
Thank you for pointing that out. It really gets to my nerves sometimes.
Of course, I am biased, given that I make a two guys joking around podcast.
I don't see this as much these days, but perhaps because I started to look for "non-current events" podcasts knowing that they were recorded earlier and better prepared.
I've gotten a lot more insistent that designers show me "empty" designs where the user has just signed up and various corner cases like a photo that is really tall.
Something like this maybe: anytime an entry pass a certain threshold of votes for the first time, add it to the feed. Each user can define the threshold in his account and get the feed from there.
While I don't know that I'd be a regular user or start discussions (I usually listen to episodes weeks after they come out), it's a cool tool for episode discovery.
Podcast suggestions should remain on the front page longer than articles do in HN though. Since listening to a podcast is way more time consuming than reading an article.
Thanks for sharing!
One of the challenges here is that, apparently, podcasts don't have very descriptive names. Maybe it's because HN has the same regular topics floating through, but I feel like I get a lot more of a preview from titles on HN than I do by things like...
"The Archers"
"Hello Internet #60: The Beautiful Game"
"Harmontown"
I suppose there's an expectation that podcasts don't need explanatory names because, well, they're not always about a specific thing and because they're expecting regular listeners to tune in. Perhaps find a way to automatically include the description of the podcast itself and/or encourage users to do the same manually?
It seems you're missing a trick by not adding a player directly on your site.
No good reason to leave your site and listen to the podcast that is discovered.
Also, you could have a url that would auto play the currently highest rated podcast:
And also a radio version that cycled through the front page from top to bottom:
There are some podcasts which I consider vital, but for most I don't care about the podcast itself but for the content of a given episode.
This app is awesome because it detaches content from podcast and helps discover cool episodes.
Wish you lots of luck!
I think that this has the same issues as https://www.producthunt.com/podcasts, for me at least.
Obviously I could look up specific episodes in my app after seeing it on your site, but that's annoying enough that I don't think I would keep it up.
An alternative idea is to build an app from this idea. I know that's a lot of work, but I might pay for that if it is a really good podcasting app. Look to Pocket Casts for inspiration.
I'll be sure to get to send you some feedback once I've used it for a while. :)
Weirdly fascinating to see BBC Radio 4's long running agricultural soap 'The Archers' on the list.
There was an episode of on podcast I listen to I thought was really poor, and would have voted down. left a comment instead
Awesome project!
They allow you to do just that. Anyway, check it out. I use the Overcast podcast client (iOS), which supports this (among others).
Some podcasts even provide full transcripts (e. g, Freakonomics).
If the podcast provides neither of these then it's not feasible to skim it efficiently, in my opinion.
How about a play count as a measure of popularity instead of just discussions? HN works because it abstracts user behaviour to a points score.
I wonder whether you could do the same for TV/movies currently on catch-up/streaming.
What about music?
Having the duration of the podcast would be handy.
Would you consider adding a "gaming" category?
Can you change the subscription confirmation email subject to include your site's title?
From "Confirmation instructions" to "PodcastRank Confirmation Instructions"?
Looks great!
{Edit: Intensify discontent after trying to use)
I wonder what happened to Rob Conery and Scott Hanselman that they decided to end it.
Design suggestion: Lose the header
Still, it looks like you're off to a good start!
On important part is the moderation to keep the discussion civil and measures against spam and voting rings. This is invisible and sometimes difficult to spot, most people just notice only the good quality of the discussion.
Another important point is the community. It's important to attract and keep a good and wide community. For most topics, you'll find here one or two experts that can comment to counter balance the hype of the article and answer the unclear details. Sometimes the comments are better than the article.
Yup, and the first few weeks when I first discovered HackerNews from Google search results a number of years ago, if it wasn't an "Ask HN" I'll admit I didn't know there was an article -- the comments were good enough not to miss it!