Is the HN algorithm rigged in favour of things he writes, or does this community really get a lot out the things he says?
[1] http://blog.samaltman.com/asana
[2] http://blog.samaltman.com/the-tech-bust-of-2015 made me laugh, for example
Is the HN algorithm rigged in favour of things he writes, or does this community really get a lot out the things he says?
[1] http://blog.samaltman.com/asana
[2] http://blog.samaltman.com/the-tech-bust-of-2015 made me laugh, for example
"Startup kids" is too dismissive. Some of the very best comments about startups come from grizzled veterans. Will ChuckMcM or Animats mind if I call them grizzled? Let's just pause to appreciate what incredible value they and others add to this community from the wealth of their experience.
Than again, depending on your definition of "kid" there are "kids" on HN whose experience with startups is already impressive. Experience should perhaps be measured in iterations, not years.
HN has many subgroups, including plenty of hackers. Plenty of purely technical stories make the front page. And the startup and hacker groups overlap.
We get complaints about the balance whichever way HN trends.
Wrong. When I first lurked here a high-percentage of posts here were relating to startup concerns. The number have dropped dramatically over time. My non-hacker son-in-law who only knows finance was a hacker news reader a few years ago, hoping to learn tips about starting something up. He gave up due to the dwindling number of such posts.