City of San Francisco says it's illegal to live in a box
sfgate.com
sfgate.com
Second of all, how long can this last? People criticize the tech economy for causing displacement and surely that's happening. But even people making extraordinarily good livings can't afford to live alone. Eventually, people will be unwilling to spend more than 50% of income on rent isn't sustainable. It seems to already be happening:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11196718
I wonder if this is just the peak and soon there will be some form of return to rationality.
This guy is having dificulty to think outside of the box..
Here you go, just 8 hours away, only $450/mo. 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom apartment Much better than a box. http://www.vivanuncios.com.mx/a-renta-inmuebles/tijuana/se-r...
That being said, some micro apartment progress could be made in SF
With building regs like other cities we'd have skyscrapers to accomodate everyone who wants to live here at reasonable cost.
6 adults living in a 3 bedroom apartment? Seems crazy I don't think I could do it.
Unlike many laws and regulations, those governing buildings tend to be more data driven than is common. The trigger for technical and empirically driven building and land development regulations in the US was the Triangle Shirtwaist fire. Much of the data on human safety in buildings was drawn from the insurance industry's actuarial and claims data. Many of the improvements in life safety driven by that industry, e.g. UL is "underwriters laboratories" and the National Fire Protection Association [NFPA] is funded by the insurance industry but it's technical documents are based on consensus with professional fire fighters.
https://medium.com/@TomPJacobs/what-housing-crisis-3c0568a5d...